Zeta potential measurement is an experiment used to evaluate how stably colloidal particles or fine particles are dispersed in a solution.
Colloidal particles often carry surface charges, and ions with the opposite charge gather around them to form an electrical double layer.
Zeta potential is an indicator representing the electrical state around these particles and is important when considering dispersion stability and the tendency for aggregation.
In a discussion of zeta potential measurement, it is not sufficient simply to write that “the zeta potential was large” or “aggregation was unlikely.”
It is necessary to explain what the sign of the zeta potential means, why a large absolute value tends to make a dispersion more stable, why changing the electrolyte concentration or pH changes the zeta potential, and why particles become more likely to aggregate when the zeta potential becomes small.
This article clearly explains, as examples of discussions that can be used in laboratory reports on zeta potential measurement, particle surface charge, the electrical double layer, the slipping plane, the sign and absolute value of zeta potential, dispersion stability, aggregation, pH, electrolyte concentration, the isoelectric point, DLVO theory, measurement errors, and points for improvement.
Note:
This article is a reference intended to assist with discussions of zeta potential measurement results obtained in physical chemistry experiments, colloid chemistry experiments, materials chemistry experiments, and environmental chemistry experiments at universities and similar institutions.
For the actual sample, dispersion medium, pH, electrolyte concentration, measurement apparatus, measurement cell, particle concentration, and safety precautions, always follow the instructions in your university’s laboratory manual and those given by your instructor or TA.
- What Is Zeta Potential?
- Main Items to Include in the Results
- Reference Experimental Values and Calculation Examples for Zeta Potential Measurement
- Reference Experimental Conditions
- Zeta Potential When pH Is Changed
- Example Calculation of Average Zeta Potential
- Relationship Between the Absolute Value of Zeta Potential and Dispersion Stability
- Concept of the Isoelectric Point
- Zeta Potential When Salt Concentration Is Changed
- Observation Results for Dispersion Stability
- Example of How to Write the Results
- Points for Connecting the Results to the Discussion
- Example Discussion
- Summary
- Discussion of Particle Surface Charge
- What Is the Electrical Double Layer?
- The Slipping Plane and Zeta Potential
- Meaning of the Sign of Zeta Potential
- Absolute Value of Zeta Potential and Dispersion Stability
- Why Aggregation Occurs
- Relationship with DLVO Theory
- Effect of pH
- Discussion of the Isoelectric Point
- Effect of Electrolyte Concentration
- Effect of Ionic Valence
- Relationship Between Particle Size and Zeta Potential
- Relationship with the Appearance of the Dispersion
- Effect of Particle Concentration
- Effects of Dispersion-Medium Viscosity and Dielectric Constant
- Discussion of the Measurement Principle
- Causes of Error in Zeta Potential Measurement
- When the Results Can Be Considered Good
- Example Discussions When the Experiment Did Not Go Well
- How to Write Points for Improvement
- Difference Between a Superficial Discussion and a Good Discussion
- Examples of Expressions That Can Be Used in Reports
- Points to Check When Discussing Zeta Potential Measurement
- Summary
What Is Zeta Potential?
Zeta potential is the electric potential near the boundary between the liquid layer that moves together with a particle and the outer liquid when a particle dispersed in a solution moves.
This boundary is called the slipping plane.
Although zeta potential does not directly represent the potential of the particle surface itself, it is an important indicator that reflects the charge state of the particle surface and the distribution of surrounding ions.
Zeta potential is related to the strength of electrostatic repulsion between particles.
When the absolute value of the zeta potential is large, particles carrying charges of the same sign repel one another strongly and the dispersed state tends to be maintained.
On the other hand, when the absolute value of the zeta potential is small, repulsion between particles becomes weaker and aggregation becomes more likely.
Example Discussion:
Zeta potential is the potential at the slipping plane near the particle surface and reflects the surface charge of the particles and the state of the surrounding electrical double layer.
The larger the absolute value of the zeta potential, the stronger the electrostatic repulsion between particles and the more difficult it becomes for particles to approach one another.
Therefore, zeta potential is an important indicator for evaluating the dispersion stability of colloidal particles.
Main Items to Include in the Results
In the results of zeta potential measurement, organize the sample name, particle concentration, dispersion medium, pH, electrolyte concentration, measurement temperature, average particle size, zeta potential, number of measurements, standard deviation, particle-size distribution, appearance of the dispersed state, and other information.
Because zeta potential is strongly affected by pH and salt concentration, the measurement conditions must always be recorded.
Main Items to Include in the Results
- Type of particle or colloid measured
- Type of dispersion medium
- Particle concentration
- pH
- Type of electrolyte
- Electrolyte concentration
- Measurement temperature
- Average particle size
- Particle-size distribution
- Average zeta potential
- Standard deviation of zeta potential
- Number of measurements
- Appearance of the dispersion
- Presence or absence of aggregation or sedimentation
- Presence or absence of an isoelectric point
- Causes of error and points for improvement
Example of How to Write the Results:
When the zeta potential of the sample dispersion was measured, a negative zeta potential was observed near neutral pH.
When the electrolyte concentration was increased, the absolute value of the zeta potential decreased and cloudiness and sedimentation were observed in the dispersion.
These results suggest that the electrolyte compressed the electrical double layer and weakened the electrostatic repulsion between particles.
Reference Experimental Values and Calculation Examples for Zeta Potential Measurement
Here, changes in zeta potential and dispersion stability when the pH or electrolyte concentration of a dispersion is changed are organized using reference experimental values.
Zeta potential is an indicator that reflects the electrical state formed near the surface of dispersed particles.
In general, the larger the absolute value of the zeta potential, the more strongly the particles tend to repel one another and the higher the dispersion stability is considered to be.
On the other hand, as the zeta potential approaches 0 mV, electrostatic repulsion between particles weakens and aggregation becomes more likely.
Reference Experimental Conditions
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Measurement target | Aqueous dispersion of oxide fine particles |
| Particle concentration | 0.05 mass% |
| Dispersion medium | Pure water or aqueous NaCl solution |
| Measurement temperature | 25°C |
| Number of measurements | 3 measurements for each condition |
| Evaluation items | Zeta potential, standard deviation, presence or absence of sedimentation and aggregation, dispersion stability |
Zeta Potential When pH Is Changed
First, the zeta potential is compared when the pH of the dispersion is changed.
Because the charge on the particle surface changes with pH, the zeta potential may differ under acidic, nearly neutral, and alkaline conditions.
| Sample | pH | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | Average Zeta Potential | Standard Deviation | Appearance After 24 Hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 3.0 | +31.8 mV | +33.2 mV | +32.5 mV | +32.5 mV | 0.7 mV | Little sedimentation, dispersed state maintained |
| B | 5.0 | +8.4 mV | +7.9 mV | +8.8 mV | +8.4 mV | 0.5 mV | Some aggregation and sedimentation observed |
| C | 7.0 | -6.2 mV | -5.7 mV | -6.5 mV | -6.1 mV | 0.4 mV | Marked aggregation and formation of a sediment layer |
| D | 9.0 | -24.7 mV | -25.9 mV | -25.1 mV | -25.2 mV | 0.6 mV | Relatively stable dispersion |
| E | 11.0 | -38.6 mV | -39.8 mV | -37.9 mV | -38.8 mV | 1.0 mV | Little sedimentation, dispersed state maintained |
Example Calculation of Average Zeta Potential
For Sample A, suppose the measured zeta potentials were +31.8 mV, +33.2 mV, and +32.5 mV.
The average value is calculated as follows.
Average zeta potential = (31.8 + 33.2 + 32.5) ÷ 3
Average zeta potential = 97.5 ÷ 3 = 32.5 mV
Therefore, the average zeta potential of Sample A is +32.5 mV.
Because it is a positive value with a relatively large absolute value, electrostatic repulsion between the particles is considered to act effectively, making it easier to maintain the dispersed state.
Relationship Between the Absolute Value of Zeta Potential and Dispersion Stability
For zeta potential, it is important to consider not only the sign but also the magnitude of the absolute value.
Whether positive or negative, a large absolute value tends to result in greater electrostatic repulsion between particles and higher dispersion stability.
| Sample | Average Zeta Potential | Absolute Value | Evaluation of Dispersion Stability | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: pH 3.0 | +32.5 mV | 32.5 mV | Relatively stable | Positively charged, making repulsion between particles likely |
| B: pH 5.0 | +8.4 mV | 8.4 mV | Unstable | The absolute value of the potential is small, making aggregation likely |
| C: pH 7.0 | -6.1 mV | 6.1 mV | Unstable | Close to 0 mV, with weak electrostatic repulsion |
| D: pH 9.0 | -25.2 mV | 25.2 mV | Somewhat stable | Negatively charged, with some repulsion acting |
| E: pH 11.0 | -38.8 mV | 38.8 mV | Stable | Large negative potential and strong repulsion between particles |
Concept of the Isoelectric Point
The pH at which the zeta potential becomes close to 0 mV is called the isoelectric point.
Near the isoelectric point, the apparent charge on the particle surface becomes small and electrostatic repulsion between particles weakens, making aggregation more likely.
In this reference example, the zeta potential is +8.4 mV at pH 5.0 and -6.1 mV at pH 7.0, and the sign of the zeta potential changes from positive to negative within this range.
Therefore, the isoelectric point is considered to lie around pH 5 to 7.
Aggregation and sedimentation were also observed after 24 hours in the samples at pH 5.0 and pH 7.0, so it can be explained that dispersion stability decreased under conditions where the zeta potential was close to 0 mV.
Zeta Potential When Salt Concentration Is Changed
Next, the zeta potential is compared when the NaCl concentration is varied under the same pH conditions.
As the electrolyte concentration increases, the electrical double layer on the particle surface may be compressed and the electrostatic repulsion between particles may weaken.
| Sample | NaCl Concentration | Average Zeta Potential | Absolute Value | Appearance After 24 Hours | Dispersion Stability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 0 mmol/L | -38.8 mV | 38.8 mV | Little sedimentation | High |
| G | 1 mmol/L | -31.6 mV | 31.6 mV | Slight sedimentation | Relatively high |
| H | 10 mmol/L | -18.4 mV | 18.4 mV | Sedimentation observed | Somewhat low |
| I | 50 mmol/L | -7.2 mV | 7.2 mV | Clear aggregation and sedimentation | Low |
| J | 100 mmol/L | -3.5 mV | 3.5 mV | Large aggregates settled | Very low |
In these results, the absolute value of the zeta potential became smaller as the NaCl concentration increased, and the dispersion became more prone to aggregation and sedimentation.
This was considered to result from shielding of the effect of the particle-surface charge by the electrolyte, which weakened the repulsion between particles.
Observation Results for Dispersion Stability
The zeta potential measurement results are easier to discuss when evaluated together with observations of the actual appearance of the dispersion.
Here, the appearance immediately after measurement and after 24 hours is compared.
| Condition | Immediately After Measurement | After 24 Hours | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| |ζ| ≥ 30 mV | Uniformly cloudy | Little sedimentation | Large repulsion between particles and stable dispersion |
| |ζ| around 10 mV | Slightly nonuniform | Sedimentation and aggregation observed | Weak repulsion and easy aggregation |
| |ζ| ≤ 5 mV | Aggregates visible | Clear sediment layer formed | Electrostatic stabilization is barely effective |
Example of How to Write the Results
When the zeta potential was measured while varying the pH, it was +32.5 mV at pH 3.0, +8.4 mV at pH 5.0, -6.1 mV at pH 7.0, -25.2 mV at pH 9.0, and -38.8 mV at pH 11.0.
Because the sign of the zeta potential changed from positive to negative between pH 5.0 and pH 7.0, the isoelectric point of these particles was considered to be around pH 5 to 7.
In addition, little sedimentation occurred in the samples at pH 3.0 and pH 11.0, where the absolute value of the zeta potential was large.
On the other hand, aggregation and sedimentation were observed after 24 hours in the samples at pH 5.0 and pH 7.0, where the zeta potential was close to 0 mV.
These results suggest that under conditions where the absolute value of the zeta potential is small, electrostatic repulsion between particles becomes weak and dispersion stability decreases.
Points for Connecting the Results to the Discussion
In a discussion of zeta potential measurement, it is important to explain not only whether the value is positive or negative but also the magnitude of the absolute value together with the appearance of the dispersion.
- Was the dispersion stable under conditions where the absolute value of the zeta potential was large?
- Did aggregation or sedimentation occur under conditions where the zeta potential was close to 0 mV?
- Can the surface charge state of the particles be considered to have changed because of a change in pH?
- Can the pH near which the sign of the zeta potential changes be explained as the isoelectric point?
- Can the increase in salt concentration be considered to have compressed the electrical double layer and reduced dispersion stability?
- Was the standard deviation of the measured values small and was the measurement reproducible?
- Could particle concentration, pH adjustment, bubbles, sedimentation, or contamination with aggregates have affected the measured values?
Example Discussion
In this experiment, the zeta potential changed greatly depending on the pH of the dispersion.
The average zeta potential was +32.5 mV at pH 3.0, whereas it was -38.8 mV at pH 11.0, showing a tendency for the particles to be positively charged under acidic conditions and negatively charged under alkaline conditions.
In addition, because the sign of the zeta potential changed between pH 5.0 and pH 7.0, the isoelectric point of these particles was considered to be around pH 5 to 7.
Regarding dispersion stability, the samples at pH 3.0 and pH 11.0, where the absolute value of the zeta potential was large, showed little sedimentation even after 24 hours and maintained a relatively stable dispersed state.
On the other hand, at pH 5.0 and pH 7.0, the zeta potential was close to 0 mV and aggregation and sedimentation were confirmed.
This was considered to result from weakened electrostatic repulsion between the particles, making it easier for them to approach one another.
In addition, when the NaCl concentration was increased, the absolute value of the zeta potential became smaller and the dispersion stability also decreased.
This was considered to result from compression of the electrical double layer on the particle surface as the electrolyte concentration increased, weakening the electrostatic repulsion between particles.
Therefore, to maintain a stable dispersion, it is necessary to appropriately control not only the pH but also the electrolyte concentration.
However, zeta potential may be affected by particle concentration, the accuracy of pH adjustment, bubbles in the measurement cell, the presence of aggregates, and other factors.
Therefore, it is important to sufficiently homogenize the dispersion before measurement and perform multiple measurements to confirm the average value and variation.
Summary
In zeta potential measurement, dispersion stability and the tendency for aggregation can be evaluated by investigating the surface charge state of dispersed particles.
In this reference example, the dispersion was stable under conditions where the absolute value of the zeta potential was large, whereas aggregation and sedimentation were more likely under conditions close to 0 mV.
In a report, presenting the average zeta potential, standard deviation, relationships with pH and salt concentration, and observations of the appearance of the dispersion together makes it easier to explain “why the dispersion was stable” and “why aggregation occurred.”
Discussion of Particle Surface Charge
Colloidal particles may carry surface charges because of dissociation of surface functional groups, adsorption of ions, defects in the crystal lattice, pH conditions, and other factors.
For example, on oxide particles, hydroxyl groups on the surface may accept or release H+, causing the surface to become positively or negatively charged.
In polymer particles and protein particles as well, the surface charge changes through ionization of functional groups.
Particle surface charge is directly related to repulsion and aggregation between particles.
Particles carrying charges of the same sign electrostatically repel one another and therefore tend to maintain the dispersed state.
When the surface charge becomes smaller, the repulsive force weakens and particles can approach one another and aggregate more easily.
Example Discussion:
Because the measured particles showed a negative zeta potential, the particle surface or the region near the slipping plane was considered to be negatively charged under the measurement conditions.
When particles carry charges of the same sign, electrostatic repulsion acts between them.
Therefore, under conditions where the absolute value of the negative zeta potential is large, the particles are less likely to aggregate and the dispersed state is easier to maintain.
What Is the Electrical Double Layer?
The electrical double layer is a structure in which ions with the opposite charge gather around a charged particle surface and the charge is distributed in layers.
The particle surface has a surface charge, and ions with the opposite sign gather strongly near it.
Further outside is a diffuse layer spread by thermal motion.
When the electrical double layer is thick, the electrical double layers of two approaching particles overlap and strong repulsion occurs.
Therefore, the particles are less likely to aggregate.
As the electrolyte concentration increases, the number of ions in the solution increases and the electrical double layer is compressed.
As a result, repulsion between particles becomes weaker.
Example Discussion:
Around colloidal particles, ions with the opposite sign to the particle-surface charge are distributed and form an electrical double layer.
When the electrical double layer extends sufficiently, strong electrostatic repulsion acts when particles approach one another.
Therefore, the state of the electrical double layer is important for understanding zeta potential and dispersion stability.
The Slipping Plane and Zeta Potential
When a particle moves in an electric field, part of the liquid close to the particle surface moves together with the particle.
However, liquid located a certain distance away from the particle does not move together with it.
The boundary between these regions is called the slipping plane.
Zeta potential is treated as the potential at this slipping plane.
Therefore, zeta potential is not the potential of the particle surface itself.
It changes depending on surface charge, adsorbed ions, the viscosity of the dispersion medium, electrolyte concentration, pH, and other factors.
Because zeta potential is related to the electrophoretic behavior actually shown by particles in solution, it is a practical indicator of dispersion stability.
Example Discussion:
Zeta potential is not the potential of the particle surface itself but the potential at the slipping plane when the particle moves.
Therefore, it is affected not only by surface charge but also by the surrounding ion distribution and electrolyte concentration.
Because it reflects how strongly particles repel one another in an actual dispersion, it is used to evaluate dispersion stability.
Meaning of the Sign of Zeta Potential
When the zeta potential is positive, the particle near the slipping plane is considered to be positively charged.
When the zeta potential is negative, the particle near the slipping plane is considered to be negatively charged.
The sign changes depending on the functional groups on the particle surface, adsorbed ions, pH, and conditions of the dispersion medium.
Particles with zeta potentials of the same sign electrostatically repel one another.
However, when considering dispersion stability, the magnitude of the absolute value is often more important than the sign itself.
Whether positive or negative, a large absolute value is considered to produce strong repulsion, while a small absolute value makes aggregation more likely.
| Zeta Potential | Meaning | Concept of Dispersion Stability |
|---|---|---|
| Large positive value | Particles are positively charged | Easy to disperse because of repulsion between positive charges |
| Value close to 0 | Effect of surface charge is small | Aggregation is likely |
| Large negative value | Particles are negatively charged | Easy to disperse because of repulsion between negative charges |
Example Discussion:
Because the zeta potential showed a negative value, the particles were considered to be negatively charged under the measurement conditions.
However, when considering dispersion stability, not only the sign but also the magnitude of the absolute value is important.
The larger the absolute value of the zeta potential, the stronger the electrostatic repulsion between particles and the less likely aggregation becomes.
Absolute Value of Zeta Potential and Dispersion Stability
The larger the absolute value of the zeta potential, the stronger the electrostatic repulsion between particles.
Therefore, particles become more difficult to approach one another and the dispersed state tends to be more stable.
In general, dispersions with zeta potentials having large absolute values tend to be less prone to sedimentation or aggregation.
On the other hand, when the zeta potential is close to 0, the electrostatic repulsion between particles becomes weak.
In this state, attractive forces such as van der Waals forces become relatively stronger, making it easier for particles to approach one another and aggregate.
Therefore, the absolute value of the zeta potential serves as a guideline for evaluating dispersion stability.
Example Discussion:
Under conditions where the absolute value of the zeta potential was large, electrostatic repulsion between particles was strong and the particles were difficult to approach one another, so the dispersion stability was considered high.
On the other hand, as the zeta potential approached 0, the repulsive force weakened and attractive forces between particles became dominant, making aggregation more likely.
Therefore, changes in the absolute value of the zeta potential reflect changes in dispersion stability.
Why Aggregation Occurs
Van der Waals forces act between colloidal particles and attract them to one another.
On the other hand, when particles carry charges of the same sign, electrostatic repulsive forces act between them.
Whether a dispersion is stable is determined by the balance between these attractive and repulsive forces.
When the absolute value of the zeta potential is large, the repulsive force exceeds the attractive force, making aggregation less likely.
However, when the zeta potential becomes small, the repulsive force weakens and the particles become more likely to aggregate through attractive forces when they approach one another.
Aggregated particles have a larger apparent particle size and may be observed as sedimentation or changes in turbidity.
Example Discussion:
The particles were considered to have aggregated because the absolute value of the zeta potential became smaller and electrostatic repulsion between particles weakened.
When the repulsive force weakens, van der Waals attraction acting between the particles becomes relatively stronger, allowing the particles to approach one another and aggregate.
As a result, the apparent particle size may have increased and changes in sedimentation or turbidity may have occurred.
Relationship with DLVO Theory
DLVO theory describes interactions between colloidal particles as the sum of electrostatic repulsive forces and van der Waals attractive forces.
When there is a sufficiently large repulsive-energy barrier between particles, the particles are difficult to approach and the dispersion remains stable.
Conversely, when this energy barrier becomes small, the particles become more likely to aggregate because of attractive forces.
Zeta potential provides a clue for considering the magnitude of electrostatic repulsion in DLVO theory.
The larger the absolute value of the zeta potential, the stronger the repulsive force and the higher the energy barrier is considered to be.
When the electrolyte concentration increases, the electrical double layer is compressed and the repulsive force weakens, making aggregation more likely.
Example Discussion:
In DLVO theory, interactions between particles are considered as a balance between electrostatic repulsive forces and van der Waals attractive forces.
Under conditions where the absolute value of the zeta potential is large, electrostatic repulsion is strong and the energy barrier that must be overcome for particles to aggregate is large.
On the other hand, when electrolyte addition reduces the absolute value of the zeta potential, the repulsive force weakens and the particles become more likely to aggregate.
Effect of pH
pH greatly affects the ionization state of functional groups on particle surfaces.
For example, oxide particles have -OH groups on their surfaces, which tend to accept H+ and become positively charged under acidic conditions and lose H+ and become negatively charged under basic conditions.
Therefore, changing the pH changes the sign and magnitude of the zeta potential.
When the pH is changed, the zeta potential may change from positive to negative or from negative to positive.
At a pH where the zeta potential approaches 0, repulsion between particles weakens and aggregation becomes more likely.
The pH near this point may be called the isoelectric point.
Acidic side: The surface readily accepts H+ and tends to become positively charged.
Basic side: The surface readily loses H+ and tends to become negatively charged.
Example Discussion:
The zeta potential changed when the pH was varied because the ionization state of functional groups on the particle surface changed.
Under acidic conditions, the surface readily accepts H+ and becomes positively charged, whereas under basic conditions it loses H+ and becomes negatively charged.
At pH values where the zeta potential is close to 0, repulsion between particles becomes weak and aggregation is more likely to occur.
Discussion of the Isoelectric Point
The isoelectric point refers to the pH at which the zeta potential of particles becomes close to 0 or to conditions where the positive and negative charges of the particles appear to balance.
Near the isoelectric point, electrostatic repulsion between particles becomes extremely weak.
Therefore, particles become more likely to aggregate, and sedimentation or an increase in particle size may be observed.
For proteins, metal oxides, mineral particles, and other materials, the isoelectric point is strongly related to dispersion stability and separation operations.
If the zeta potential crosses 0 in an experiment where pH is varied, that pH can be discussed as the isoelectric point.
At pH values away from the isoelectric point, particles may be strongly positively or negatively charged and dispersion stability may increase.
Example Discussion:
Near the pH at which the zeta potential approached 0, electrostatic repulsion between particles weakened and aggregation was considered to have become more likely.
This pH is close to the isoelectric point, where the positive and negative charges on the particle surface are apparently balanced.
At pH values away from the isoelectric point, the absolute value of the zeta potential becomes larger and repulsion between particles becomes stronger, making the dispersion more stable.
Effect of Electrolyte Concentration
Increasing the electrolyte concentration increases the number of ions in the solution.
This may compress the electrical double layer around the particles and reduce the potential at the slipping plane, that is, the absolute value of the zeta potential.
As a result, electrostatic repulsion between particles weakens and aggregation becomes more likely.
At low electrolyte concentrations, the electrical double layer is relatively thick and strong repulsion acts when particles approach one another.
At high electrolyte concentrations, the electrical double layer becomes thinner and particles can approach one another more easily.
Therefore, if particle size increases or sedimentation occurs under conditions where salt is added, a decrease in zeta potential caused by the electrolyte should be considered.
Example Discussion:
When the electrolyte concentration was increased, the absolute value of the zeta potential decreased.
This was considered to result from an increase in the number of ions in the solution, which compressed the electrical double layer surrounding the particles.
When the electrical double layer is compressed, electrostatic repulsion between particles weakens and the particles become more likely to aggregate.
Effect of Ionic Valence
The valence of electrolyte ions also affects zeta potential and aggregation.
Multivalent ions with a charge opposite to that of the particle surface may strongly neutralize the particle-surface charge and greatly compress the electrical double layer.
Therefore, divalent ions may cause aggregation more readily than monovalent ions, and trivalent ions more readily than divalent ions, even in small amounts.
This is also related to the Schulze-Hardy rule known in colloid coagulation.
However, in practice, ion hydration, specific adsorption, pH changes, and functional groups on the particle surface also have effects.
If the zeta potential changes greatly when multivalent ions are added, not only ionic strength but also adsorption onto the surface must be considered.
Example Discussion:
If the absolute value of the zeta potential decreased greatly and aggregation became more likely under conditions where multivalent ions were added, neutralization of the surface charge by oppositely charged ions may have occurred.
Ions with higher valence compress the electrical double layer more strongly and weaken electrostatic repulsion between particles.
Therefore, even a small amount of multivalent ions may have greatly reduced the dispersion stability.
Relationship Between Particle Size and Zeta Potential
Zeta potential is an indicator of the electrical state near the particle surface and does not directly represent particle size itself.
However, when particles aggregate, the apparent particle size increases, and this often occurs under conditions where the absolute value of the zeta potential is small.
Therefore, combining particle-size measurement with zeta potential measurement allows dispersion stability to be evaluated in greater detail.
If the absolute value of the zeta potential is small and the average particle size is large, the particles may be aggregated.
On the other hand, if the absolute value of the zeta potential is large and the particle-size distribution is narrow, the particles may be relatively well dispersed.
However, particle size is also affected by particle shape, concentration, measurement method, and sedimentation.
Example Discussion:
If the average particle size increased under conditions where the absolute value of the zeta potential was small, electrostatic repulsion between particles may have weakened and aggregation may have occurred.
When aggregates form, the apparent particle size measured becomes larger.
Therefore, evaluating zeta potential together with the particle-size distribution makes it possible to discuss dispersion stability more specifically.
Relationship with the Appearance of the Dispersion
Changes in zeta potential may also affect the visible appearance of a dispersion.
When the dispersion is stable, particles remain finely and uniformly dispersed, and sedimentation or large aggregates are less likely to be observed.
On the other hand, as aggregation progresses, changes in turbidity, precipitation, clarification of the supernatant, and particle sedimentation may be observed.
However, it may not always be possible to accurately judge dispersion stability from appearance alone.
If particles remain as fine aggregates, the dispersion may still look cloudy even though the particle size has increased.
Therefore, it is important to discuss zeta potential, particle size, and appearance together.
Example Discussion:
If sedimentation or clarification of the supernatant was observed under conditions where the absolute value of the zeta potential was small, the particles were considered to have aggregated into larger assemblies and settled under gravity.
On the other hand, under conditions where the absolute value of the zeta potential was large, repulsion between particles was strong and the dispersed state was more readily maintained visually.
It is important to evaluate not only the appearance but also particle-size measurement and zeta potential measurement together.
Effect of Particle Concentration
In zeta potential measurement, particle concentrations that are either too high or too low may affect the measured value.
If the particle concentration is too high, multiple scattering and particle-particle interactions may become strong and the measurement may become unstable.
Aggregation may also proceed more readily and affect the apparent zeta potential and particle size.
If the particle concentration is too low, the measurement signal may become weak and the variation in the data may become large.
Therefore, measurement must be performed within a concentration range suitable for the apparatus.
When the sample is diluted, care must be taken not to change the pH or electrolyte concentration.
Example Discussion:
One possible cause of the large variation in the measured values is that the particle concentration was outside the range suitable for measurement.
If the concentration is too high, multiple scattering and particle-particle interactions have an effect, whereas if it is too low, the measurement signal becomes weak.
In addition, because changing the pH or electrolyte concentration during dilution also changes the zeta potential, the dilution conditions must be standardized.
Effects of Dispersion-Medium Viscosity and Dielectric Constant
Because zeta potential is often converted from electrophoretic mobility, the viscosity and dielectric constant of the dispersion medium are involved in the calculation.
When solvents other than water are used, or when polymers, sugars, salts, or other substances in the solution change the viscosity, the measured and converted values may be affected.
In a highly viscous dispersion medium, particle movement becomes slower.
Changes in dielectric constant also affect the electrical double layer and electrophoretic behavior.
If the dispersion-medium conditions entered into the measurement apparatus differ from the actual conditions, errors may occur in the calculated zeta potential.
Example Discussion:
Because zeta potential is determined from electrophoretic mobility, the settings for the viscosity and dielectric constant of the dispersion medium affect the measured value.
If the viscosity of the dispersion medium is high, the particle migration velocity changes and errors may occur in conversion to zeta potential.
Therefore, when measuring dispersion media other than water or high-viscosity solutions, the dispersion-medium conditions must be set correctly.
Discussion of the Measurement Principle
Zeta potential is often measured by electrophoresis.
When an electric field is applied, charged particles move toward the electrode with the opposite sign.
The speed of this movement is measured as electrophoretic mobility and is converted to zeta potential using the viscosity and dielectric constant of the dispersion medium.
In other words, zeta potential measurement reflects how particles actually move in an electric field.
If particles have aggregated and become large or are sedimenting, the measured mobility may become unstable.
Understanding the measurement principle makes it easier to consider the causes of data variation and abnormal values.
Example Discussion:
Zeta potential is determined from the electrophoretic mobility of particles in an electric field.
When particles are charged, they move in response to the electric field, and their migration velocity reflects the potential at the slipping plane.
If the particles are aggregated or sedimenting, the mobility may become unstable and the variation in the measured zeta potential may increase.
Causes of Error in Zeta Potential Measurement
Causes of error in zeta potential measurement include inappropriate particle concentration, the presence of aggregated particles, bubbles, contamination of the measurement cell, errors in pH adjustment, deviations in electrolyte concentration, temperature changes, incorrect settings for dispersion-medium viscosity, sedimentation, and changes in the sample over time.
Because zeta potential is sensitive to the state of the dispersion, even small differences in sample preparation can change the value.
The results may also change depending on whether ultrasonic dispersion or stirring is performed before measurement.
Strong dispersion may break apart aggregates and change the zeta potential and particle size, while excessive treatment may alter the particle surface.
It is important to standardize the measurement conditions and confirm reproducibility by performing multiple measurements.
Example Discussion:
Possible causes of variation in the measured values include inappropriate particle concentration, contamination with aggregated particles, contamination of the measurement cell, bubbles, and deviations in pH or electrolyte concentration.
Because zeta potential is sensitive to the state of the dispersion, even slight differences in sample-preparation conditions may change the value.
Therefore, it is important to keep the dispersion treatment, pH adjustment, cell cleaning, and temperature control constant before measurement.
When the Results Can Be Considered Good
Zeta potential measurement can be considered to have produced good results when repeated measurements under the same conditions show little variation and consistent trends are obtained in response to changes in pH or electrolyte concentration.
For example, if the absolute value of the zeta potential decreases as the electrolyte concentration increases and aggregation or an increase in particle size is observed, the result can be explained as a decrease in dispersion stability caused by compression of the electrical double layer.
In an experiment where pH is varied, if the zeta potential changes from positive to negative and aggregation becomes more likely near the pH where the value is close to 0, the result can be considered reasonable and demonstrates the relationship between the isoelectric point and dispersion stability.
It is important that changes in zeta potential, particle size, and appearance correspond to one another.
Example Discussion:
In this experiment, the absolute value of the zeta potential decreased as the electrolyte concentration increased, and the average particle size increased at the same time.
This was considered to result from compression of the electrical double layer and weakening of electrostatic repulsion between particles.
Because the decrease in zeta potential corresponded to the increase in particle size, the relationship between reduced dispersion stability and aggregation could be confirmed.
Example Discussions When the Experiment Did Not Go Well
When zeta potential measurement does not go well, possible causes can be considered from results such as large variation in measured values, unstable positive and negative signs, poor reproducibility for the same sample, lack of correspondence with particle-size measurement, or absence of the expected pH dependence.
Organizing the causes according to sample preparation, particle concentration, pH, electrolyte concentration, aggregation, bubbles, cell contamination, and dispersion treatment makes the discussion easier.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason for the low reproducibility of the measured values is that aggregated particles were present in the dispersion and particle movement became nonuniform during measurement.
In addition, bubbles or contamination in the measurement cell may affect optical detection or electrophoretic measurement and cause variation in the zeta potential values.
Therefore, the sample should be uniformly dispersed before measurement, the cell should be thoroughly cleaned, and bubbles should be removed.
Another Example Discussion:
Possible reasons why the zeta potential did not change as expected when the pH was varied include insufficient equilibration time after pH adjustment and simultaneous changes in electrolyte concentration.
Because adding an acid or base to adjust the pH also changes the ionic strength, changes in zeta potential cannot necessarily be attributed only to pH.
Therefore, pH and electrolyte concentration must be controlled separately.
How to Write Points for Improvement
In a discussion of zeta potential measurement, writing not only the causes of error but also points for improvement makes the report easier to organize.
Points for improvement can be organized according to sample preparation, pH and electrolyte conditions, measurement operation, and data analysis.
Improvements to Sample Preparation
- Adjust the particle concentration to a range suitable for the apparatus
- Disperse the particles uniformly before measurement
- Remove large aggregates
- Do not change the pH or electrolyte concentration during dilution
- Use the same dispersion-treatment conditions
- Standardize the standing time before measurement
Improvements to pH and Electrolyte Conditions
- Measure pH accurately
- Allow sufficient equilibration time after pH adjustment
- Prepare the electrolyte concentration accurately
- Distinguish between pH changes and changes in ionic strength
- Keep the temperature constant
- Correctly set the viscosity and dielectric constant of the dispersion medium
Improvements to the Measurement Operation
- Thoroughly clean the measurement cell
- Avoid introducing bubbles
- Perform the measurement before sedimentation occurs
- Perform multiple measurements and calculate the average value and standard deviation
- Use particle-size measurement together with zeta potential measurement
- Record appearance observations as well
Example of How to Write Points for Improvement:
To improve the reproducibility of zeta potential measurement, the particle concentration must be adjusted appropriately and the dispersion treatment before measurement must be kept constant.
In addition, because pH and electrolyte concentration greatly affect zeta potential, it is important to allow sufficient equilibration time after adjustment and standardize the measurement conditions.
Avoiding contamination and bubbles in the measurement cell and showing the average value and standard deviation from multiple measurements increases the reliability of the results.
Difference Between a Superficial Discussion and a Good Discussion
In a discussion of zeta potential measurement, simply writing that “the value was large, so it was stable” or “it was close to 0, so aggregation occurred” results in a superficial discussion.
A good discussion relates particle surface charge, the electrical double layer, electrostatic repulsion, van der Waals forces, pH, electrolyte concentration, and particle-size changes.
| Superficial Discussion | Good Discussion |
|---|---|
| The zeta potential was large, so it was stable. | Under conditions where the absolute value of the zeta potential was large, electrostatic repulsion between particles was strong and the particles were difficult to approach one another, so the dispersed state was considered to have remained stable. |
| The zeta potential was close to 0, so aggregation occurred. | As the zeta potential approached 0, electrostatic repulsion weakened and van der Waals attraction became relatively dominant, making aggregation between particles more likely. |
| The value became smaller when salt was added. | The increase in electrolyte concentration compressed the electrical double layer around the particles and reduced the potential at the slipping plane, causing the absolute value of the zeta potential to decrease. |
| The value changed with pH. | The change in pH altered the ionization state of functional groups on the particle surface and therefore changed the magnitude and sign of the surface charge, resulting in a change in zeta potential. |
| The particle size also increased. | Under conditions where the absolute value of the zeta potential became smaller, repulsion between particles weakened and aggregates formed, resulting in an increase in the apparent average particle size. |
Examples of Expressions That Can Be Used in Reports
The following expressions can be used when writing the results and discussion of zeta potential measurement.
Adjust the necessary parts according to your own experimental results.
- Zeta potential is the potential at the slipping plane surrounding a particle.
- Zeta potential reflects the particle-surface charge and the state of the electrical double layer.
- The larger the absolute value of the zeta potential, the stronger the electrostatic repulsion between particles.
- As the zeta potential approaches 0, particles become more likely to aggregate.
- As the electrolyte concentration increases, the electrical double layer may be compressed and the absolute value of the zeta potential may decrease.
- pH changes the ionization state of functional groups on the particle surface and affects the zeta potential.
- Near the isoelectric point, repulsion between particles is weak and aggregation or sedimentation is more likely.
- If a decrease in zeta potential corresponds to an increase in particle size, aggregation can be considered to have progressed.
- In DLVO theory, dispersion stability is explained by the balance between electrostatic repulsive forces and van der Waals attractive forces.
- Variation in measured values is affected by particle concentration, aggregation, pH, electrolyte concentration, bubbles, and cell contamination.
Points to Check When Discussing Zeta Potential Measurement
Checking the following points before writing the report makes the discussion easier to write.
- Is the definition of zeta potential explained?
- Is the concept of the slipping plane described?
- Are particle surface charge and the electrical double layer related?
- Are the sign and absolute value of the zeta potential distinguished?
- Is dispersion stability explained in terms of electrostatic repulsion?
- Is aggregation considered in terms of the balance with van der Waals forces?
- Is the change in zeta potential with pH explained?
- Are the isoelectric point and the tendency for aggregation related?
- Are electrolyte concentration and compression of the electrical double layer explained?
- Are changes in particle size and appearance related to zeta potential?
- Are measurement errors related to sample preparation and cell condition?
- Do the points for improvement correspond to the causes of error?
Summary
Zeta potential measurement is an important measurement for evaluating the dispersion stability of colloidal particles and fine particles.
Zeta potential is the potential at the slipping plane when a particle moves in solution and reflects the particle-surface charge and the state of the electrical double layer.
The larger the absolute value of the zeta potential, the stronger the electrostatic repulsion between particles and the more stable the dispersed state tends to be.
On the other hand, as the zeta potential approaches 0, repulsion between particles weakens and the particles become more likely to aggregate because of attractive forces such as van der Waals forces.
Changes in pH alter the ionization state of functional groups on the particle surface and change the sign and magnitude of the zeta potential.
In addition, as the electrolyte concentration increases, the electrical double layer may be compressed, the absolute value of the zeta potential may decrease, and aggregation may become more likely.
In a report, rather than simply writing that “the zeta potential was large” or “aggregation occurred,” organize and discuss particle surface charge, the electrical double layer, the slipping plane, pH, electrolyte concentration, the isoelectric point, DLVO theory, particle-size changes, appearance observations, causes of error, and points for improvement.
Zeta potential measurement is an important experiment for quantitatively understanding the relationship between colloidal dispersion stability and aggregation.
