In NMR spectrum measurements, differences in the chemical environments surrounding atomic nuclei in molecules are used to estimate the structures of compounds.
In organic chemistry experiments, 1H NMR is particularly common, and chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting patterns can be used to determine the types, numbers, and neighboring relationships of hydrogen atoms.
In a discussion of NMR spectra, it is not sufficient simply to write that “a peak appeared,” “the integration ratio matched,” or “splitting was observed.”
It is necessary to discuss at which chemical shifts signals appear, which hydrogens they originate from, whether the integration ratios correspond to the numbers of hydrogens in the structural formula, and whether the number of neighboring hydrogens can be explained from the splitting patterns.
This article clearly explains, as examples of discussions that can be used in NMR spectrum laboratory reports, how to interpret chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting, how to assign peaks, points for structural estimation, how to handle solvent peaks and impurities, sources of error, and points for improvement.
Note:
This article is a reference intended to assist with discussions of NMR spectra obtained in organic chemistry experiments and instrumental-analysis experiments at universities and similar institutions.
For the actual nucleus measured, measurement solvent, reference substance, chemical-shift range, peak assignments, and analysis method, always follow the instructions in your university’s laboratory manual and those given by your instructor or TA.
- What Is an NMR Spectrum?
- Main Items to Include in the Results
- Reference Experimental Values and Analysis Examples for NMR Spectra
- Reference Experimental Conditions
- Main Items Examined in NMR Analysis
- Approximate Chemical-Shift Ranges
- Basics of Splitting Patterns
- Example 1H NMR Measurement of Ethanol
- Example of Determining the Number of Hydrogens From Integration Ratios
- Example 1H NMR Measurement of Ethyl Acetate
- How to Recognize an Ethyl Group
- Example 1H NMR Measurement of Ethylbenzene
- Example Calculation of Coupling Constant J
- Examples of Coupling-Constant Comparisons
- Example 1H NMR Measurement of Unknown Sample X
- Comparison of Unknown Sample X With Candidate Compounds
- Confirmation of an OH Peak by Addition of Heavy Water
- Examples of Solvent Peaks and Impurity Peaks
- Example of Peak Overlap
- Reference Data for 13C NMR
- Reference 13C NMR Example for Ethyl Acetate
- Example of How to Write the Results
- Points for Connecting the Results to the Discussion
- Example Discussion
- Summary
- What Is Chemical Shift?
- How to Read Chemical Shifts
- What Is an Integration Ratio?
- How to Read Integration Ratios
- What Is Splitting?
- Discussion of the n+1 Rule
- How to Interpret Singlets, Doublets, Triplets, and Quartets
- What Is a Coupling Constant?
- Equivalent and Nonequivalent Hydrogens
- Discussion of Aromatic Hydrogens
- NMR Discussion of Alkyl Groups
- Discussion of Hydrogens Adjacent to O or N
- Discussion of OH and NH Protons
- Discussion of Aldehyde Hydrogens
- Discussion of Carboxylic-Acid Hydrogens
- Discussion of Solvent Peaks
- Discussion of Water Peaks and Impurity Peaks
- Discussion When Peaks Overlap
- Discussion When Peaks Are Broad
- Comparison of the NMR Spectra of Starting Materials and Products
- NMR Discussion of Ester Synthesis
- NMR Discussion of Acetanilide Synthesis
- How to Proceed With Structural Estimation
- How to Write a Peak-Assignment Table
- What Is Difficult to Determine From NMR Alone?
- Comparison With Literature Spectra
- When NMR Results Can Be Considered Good
- Example Discussion When the Experiment Did Not Go Well
- Discussion When Integration Ratios Do Not Agree
- Discussion When Splitting Is Difficult to Observe
- Discussion When the Number of Peaks Differs From the Expected Number
- How to Write Points for Improvement
- Difference Between a Superficial Discussion and a Good Discussion
- Examples of Expressions That Can Be Used in Reports
- Points to Check When Discussing NMR Spectra
- Summary
What Is an NMR Spectrum?
NMR is an analytical method that uses nuclear magnetic resonance.
Certain atomic nuclei placed in a magnetic field absorb radio waves and change their energy states.
Because the position of this absorption changes depending on the electronic environment surrounding the nucleus, it is possible to investigate the chemical environments of atoms within a molecule.
1H NMR and 13C NMR are commonly used in organic chemistry.
1H NMR makes it relatively easy to determine the types, numbers, and neighboring relationships of hydrogen atoms and is therefore extremely useful for structural estimation.
13C NMR can be used to confirm the carbon skeleton and carbon environments around functional groups.
Example Discussion:
In an NMR spectrum, differences in the electronic environments surrounding atomic nuclei in a molecule are observed as chemical shifts.
Multiple signals were observed in the 1H NMR spectrum obtained in this experiment, and each was considered to originate from hydrogen atoms in different chemical environments.
Therefore, the structure of the sample can be estimated by combining chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting patterns.
Main Items to Include in the Results
In NMR spectrum results, organize the nucleus measured, measurement solvent, reference substance, chemical shifts of the major signals, integration ratios, splitting patterns, coupling constants, and assigned hydrogens or carbons.
In synthesis experiments, compare the spectra of the starting material and product and confirm whether signals originating from the starting material have disappeared and whether signals corresponding to the product have appeared.
Main Items to Include in the Results
- Nucleus measured
- Measurement solvent
- Reference substance
- Chemical shift
- Integration ratio
- Splitting pattern
- Coupling constant
- Peak assignment
- Solvent peak
- Water peak
- Impurity peaks
- Comparison with the starting-material spectrum
- Comparison with the product spectrum
- Comparison with literature values
- Correspondence with the structural formula
- Sources of error and points for improvement
Example of How to Write the Results:
In the obtained 1H NMR spectrum, multiple signals were observed in chemical-shift regions expected from the structure of the target compound.
The integration ratios of the signals generally agreed with the ratio of the numbers of hydrogens in the structural formula.
In addition, the number of neighboring hydrogens was estimated from the splitting patterns, and it was confirmed that the results did not contradict the structure of the target compound.
Reference Experimental Values and Analysis Examples for NMR Spectra
Here, reference experimental values for estimating the structures of organic compounds using chemical shifts, integration values, splitting patterns, and coupling constants obtained from 1H NMR spectra are organized.
In an NMR spectrum, the chemical shift changes depending on the chemical environment of the hydrogen atom.
The ratio of the numbers of hydrogens can be read from the integration values, and the number of neighboring hydrogens can be estimated from the splitting pattern.
By combining this information, partial structures and the presence of functional groups in a molecule can be discussed.
Reference Experimental Conditions
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Measurement target | Ethanol, ethyl acetate, ethylbenzene, unknown sample |
| Nucleus measured | 1H NMR |
| Measurement solvent | CDCl3 or D2O |
| Reference substance | TMS = 0 ppm |
| Measurement frequency | 400 MHz |
| Evaluation items | Chemical shift, integration ratio, splitting, coupling constant, solvent peaks, impurity peaks |
Main Items Examined in NMR Analysis
| Item | Meaning | Use in Structural Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical shift | Position at which a peak appears | Estimate functional groups and the electronic environment surrounding the hydrogen |
| Integration value | Value corresponding to peak area | Determine the ratio of the numbers of hydrogens |
| Splitting pattern | Number of lines into which a peak is split | Estimate the number of neighboring hydrogens |
| Coupling constant J | Spacing of the splitting | Provides clues to neighboring relationships and stereochemical arrangement |
| Peak shape | Sharp, broad, overlapping, etc. | Consider exchangeable hydrogens, impurities, and overlapping signals |
Approximate Chemical-Shift Ranges
In 1H NMR, peak positions change depending on the environment surrounding the hydrogen.
Representative approximate chemical-shift ranges are shown below.
| Chemical Shift | Type of Hydrogen | Example Structure | Direction of Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.8–1.5 ppm | H in alkyl groups | CH3, CH2 | Saturated-hydrocarbon portion |
| 2.0–2.7 ppm | Adjacent to a carbonyl group or aromatic ring | CH3CO, Ph-CH3 | Effects of electron-withdrawing groups or aromatic rings |
| 3.0–4.5 ppm | H adjacent to O or N | CH3O, CH2O | Shifted downfield by the effects of oxygen or nitrogen |
| 5.0–6.5 ppm | Alkene H | C=C-H | Presence of a double bond |
| 6.5–8.5 ppm | Aromatic H | Benzene ring | Presence of an aromatic ring |
| 9.0–10.0 ppm | Aldehyde H | CHO | Presence of an aldehyde group |
| 10–13 ppm | Carboxylic-acid H | COOH | Often appears as a broad peak |
Basics of Splitting Patterns
When there are n equivalent hydrogens on an adjacent carbon, a peak is approximately split into n+1 lines.
| Number of Adjacent Hydrogens | Splitting Pattern | Number of Lines | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Singlet | 1 | Isolated CH3 |
| 1 | Doublet | 2 | CH3 in CH-CH3 |
| 2 | Triplet | 3 | CH3-CH2 |
| 3 | Quartet | 4 | CH3-CH2 |
| 4 or more | Multiplet | Complex | When multiple neighboring H atoms are present |
Example 1H NMR Measurement of Ethanol
Reference 1H NMR data for ethanol, CH3CH2OH, are shown below.
| Peak | Chemical Shift | Integration Ratio | Splitting | Assignment | How to Interpret the Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1.18 ppm | 3H | Triplet | CH3 | Split into three lines by the neighboring CH2 |
| B | 3.65 ppm | 2H | Quartet | CH2O | Split into four lines by the neighboring CH3 |
| C | 2.10 ppm | 1H | Broad | OH | Exchangeable hydrogen and therefore readily broadened |
The integration ratio is 3:2:1, corresponding to the numbers of hydrogens in the CH3, CH2, and OH groups of ethanol.
Because CH3 and CH2 split each other, a combination of a triplet and a quartet is observed.
Example of Determining the Number of Hydrogens From Integration Ratios
NMR integration values represent the ratio of the numbers of hydrogens corresponding to each peak.
For example, if the integration values for a compound are 3.00, 2.00, and 1.00, the ratio is 3:2:1.
| Peak | Integration Value | Integer Ratio | Estimated Number of Hydrogens |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 3.00 | 3 | CH3 |
| B | 2.00 | 2 | CH2 |
| C | 1.00 | 1 | OH or CH |
However, integration values represent ratios rather than absolute numbers of hydrogens, so they are judged in combination with the molecular formula and other analytical results.
Example 1H NMR Measurement of Ethyl Acetate
A reference spectrum for ethyl acetate, CH3COOCH2CH3, is shown below.
| Peak | Chemical Shift | Integration Ratio | Splitting | Assignment | Structural Clue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1.26 ppm | 3H | Triplet | OCH2CH3 | Terminal CH3 of an ethyl group |
| B | 2.05 ppm | 3H | Singlet | CH3CO | Methyl group adjacent to a carbonyl |
| C | 4.12 ppm | 2H | Quartet | OCH2 | Appears downfield because it is adjacent to oxygen |
The triplet at 1.26 ppm and quartet at 4.12 ppm are a characteristic combination for an ethyl group.
The singlet at 2.05 ppm corresponds to the CH3 of an acetyl group with no neighboring hydrogens.
How to Recognize an Ethyl Group
In an ethyl group, CH3CH2-, the CH3 tends to appear as a triplet and the CH2 as a quartet, with an integration ratio of 3:2.
| Partial Structure | Peak 1 | Peak 2 | Integration Ratio | Point for Judgment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH3CH2- | CH3: triplet | CH2: quartet | 3:2 | Typical ethyl group |
| CH3CO- | CH3: singlet | – | 3 | No neighboring H |
| (CH3)2CH- | CH3: doublet | CH: septet | 6:1 | Isopropyl group |
Example 1H NMR Measurement of Ethylbenzene
Reference data for ethylbenzene, C6H5CH2CH3, are shown below.
| Peak | Chemical Shift | Integration Ratio | Splitting | Assignment | Structural Clue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1.23 ppm | 3H | Triplet | CH3 | Terminal portion of the ethyl group |
| B | 2.65 ppm | 2H | Quartet | Ph-CH2 | Adjacent to an aromatic ring |
| C | 7.10–7.30 ppm | 5H | Multiplet | Aromatic H | Monosubstituted benzene ring |
Because an aromatic peak corresponding to 5H is present near 7 ppm, a monosubstituted benzene ring is considered to be present.
In addition, the triplet at 1.23 ppm and quartet at 2.65 ppm suggest an ethyl group attached to the aromatic ring.
Example Calculation of Coupling Constant J
The coupling constant J can be determined from the spacing between split peaks.
Consider a 400 MHz NMR spectrum in which the spacing between adjacent peaks of a triplet is 0.018 ppm.
J (Hz) = Peak spacing (ppm) × Measurement frequency (MHz)
J = 0.018 × 400 = 7.2 Hz
If the coupling constants of the CH3 and CH2 groups in an ethyl group are both approximately 7 Hz, it becomes easier to associate the peaks as originating from the same neighboring relationship.
Examples of Coupling-Constant Comparisons
| Partial Structure | Combination of Splitting | Approximate J Value | Direction of Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethyl group | Triplet / quartet | Approximately 7 Hz | CH3 and CH2 are adjacent |
| Vinyl group, trans | Doublets | Approximately 12–18 Hz | Possible trans arrangement |
| Vinyl group, cis | Doublets | Approximately 6–12 Hz | Possible cis arrangement |
| Adjacent aromatic H | Complex splitting | Approximately 7–9 Hz | Effect of ortho coupling |
Example 1H NMR Measurement of Unknown Sample X
Suppose the following peaks were obtained in the 1H NMR spectrum of unknown sample X.
| Peak | Chemical Shift | Integration Ratio | Splitting | Estimated Partial Structure | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1.26 ppm | 3H | Triplet | CH3CH2- | Terminal portion of an ethyl group |
| B | 2.05 ppm | 3H | Singlet | CH3CO- | Methyl group adjacent to a carbonyl |
| C | 4.12 ppm | 2H | Quartet | -OCH2- | CH2 adjacent to oxygen |
This spectrum contains a 3H triplet and a 2H quartet, suggesting the presence of an ethyl group.
In addition, the 3H singlet at 2.05 ppm corresponds to a methyl group adjacent to a carbonyl, such as CH3CO-.
Combining these findings suggests that unknown sample X is highly likely to be ethyl acetate.
Comparison of Unknown Sample X With Candidate Compounds
| Item | Unknown Sample X | Candidate 1: Ethyl Acetate | Candidate 2: Ethanol | Candidate 3: Ethylbenzene |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integration ratio | 3:3:2 | 3:3:2 | 3:2:1 | 3:2:5 |
| Peak near 4 ppm | Present | OCH2 | CH2OH | Absent |
| 3H singlet near 2 ppm | Present | CH3CO | Absent | Absent |
| Aromatic peak | Absent | Absent | Absent | 5H near 7 ppm |
| Judgment | – | Best match | Partially inconsistent | Inconsistent because no aromatic peak is present |
Unknown sample X most closely matches ethyl acetate in the combination of integration ratio, splitting, and chemical shift.
Confirmation of an OH Peak by Addition of Heavy Water
Exchangeable hydrogens such as OH and NH may disappear or become weaker when D2O is added.
| Condition | OH Peak | CH3 Peak | CH2 Peak | How to Interpret the Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before addition of D2O | Broad peak at 2.10 ppm | Present at 1.18 ppm | Present at 3.65 ppm | OH peak is visible |
| After addition of D2O | Disappears or greatly decreases | Little change | Little change | Judged to be an exchangeable hydrogen |
A peak that disappears after addition of D2O is highly likely to be an exchangeable hydrogen such as OH or NH.
Examples of Solvent Peaks and Impurity Peaks
In NMR, solvent peaks and impurity peaks that do not originate from the sample may also be observed.
Care must be taken not to mistake these for peaks of the target compound.
| Peak Position | Example Origin | Characteristic | Direction of Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.26 ppm | Residual CHCl3 in CDCl3 | Singlet | Treat as a solvent peak |
| 1.56 ppm | Water | Position changes depending on conditions | Water in the sample |
| 0.00 ppm | TMS | Reference peak | Chemical-shift reference |
| 3.30–3.60 ppm | Methanol, etc. | Residual solvent | Possibility of insufficient purification |
| 2.50 ppm | Residual proton in DMSO-d6 | Solvent-derived | Pay attention to the measurement solvent |
For example, when CDCl3 is used as the solvent, care must be taken not to mistake the peak near 7.26 ppm for an aromatic hydrogen.
Example of Peak Overlap
When multiple hydrogens have similar chemical shifts, their peaks may appear to overlap.
In such cases, interpretation of integration values and splitting becomes difficult.
| Condition | Observed Peaks | Problem | Example Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Well separated | Each peak is independent | Easy to analyze | Can be integrated directly |
| Partial overlap | Peak shoulders overlap | Integration value changes depending on the integration range | Enlarge the display and check the integration range |
| Strong overlap | Appears as one multiplet | Splitting pattern is difficult to read | Use another solvent, two-dimensional NMR, or other analytical methods |
Reference Data for 13C NMR
In 13C NMR, chemical shifts vary greatly depending on the type of carbon.
Combining 13C NMR with 1H NMR increases the reliability of structural estimation.
| Chemical Shift | Type of Carbon | Example | Direction of Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–50 ppm | Alkyl carbon | CH3, CH2 | Saturated carbon |
| 50–80 ppm | Carbon adjacent to O or N | OCH3, OCH2 | Effect of a heteroatom |
| 110–150 ppm | Alkene or aromatic carbon | C=C, benzene ring | Unsaturated bond |
| 160–185 ppm | Carbonyl carbon of esters and acids | COOR, COOH | Carbonyl carbon |
| 190–220 ppm | Carbonyl carbon of aldehydes and ketones | CHO, C=O | Strongly downfield |
Reference 13C NMR Example for Ethyl Acetate
| Chemical Shift | Assignment | Type of Carbon | Structural Clue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 ppm | CH3CH2O | Alkyl CH3 | Terminal portion of an ethyl group |
| 21 ppm | CH3CO | CH3 adjacent to a carbonyl | Acetyl group |
| 60 ppm | OCH2 | Carbon adjacent to oxygen | Ethyl group of an ester |
| 171 ppm | COO | Ester carbonyl | Presence of an ester group |
If an ethyl group and an acetyl group are suggested by 1H NMR and an ester carbonyl carbon is observed near 171 ppm in 13C NMR, the structure of ethyl acetate is more strongly supported.
Example of How to Write the Results
In the 1H NMR spectrum of ethanol, a 3H triplet at 1.18 ppm, a 2H quartet at 3.65 ppm, and a 1H broad peak at 2.10 ppm were observed.
The integration ratio was 3:2:1, corresponding to the numbers of hydrogens in CH3, CH2, and OH.
In addition, because CH3 appeared as a triplet and CH2 as a quartet, the presence of a CH3CH2- ethyl portion was suggested.
For ethyl acetate, a 3H triplet at 1.26 ppm, a 2H quartet at 4.12 ppm, and a 3H singlet at 2.05 ppm were observed.
The peaks at 1.26 ppm and 4.12 ppm had an integration ratio of 3:2 and corresponded to an ethyl group in which the signals split each other.
Furthermore, the CH2 peak at 4.12 ppm was considered to appear downfield because the CH2 is adjacent to oxygen.
The 3H singlet at 2.05 ppm corresponds to CH3CO-, which has no neighboring hydrogens.
This peak appears farther downfield than an ordinary alkyl CH3 because of the influence of the carbonyl group.
Based on these results, unknown sample X is highly likely to be ethyl acetate containing an ethyl group and an acetyl group.
Points for Connecting the Results to the Discussion
In a discussion of NMR spectra, it is important not to examine chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting patterns separately, but to combine them to estimate the structure.
- Can functional groups and the surrounding environment be estimated from chemical shifts?
- Can the ratio of the numbers of hydrogens be correctly read from integration values?
- Can the number of neighboring hydrogens be estimated from splitting patterns?
- Can a combination of a triplet and quartet be explained as an ethyl group?
- Can the reason for a singlet be explained in relation to the absence of neighboring hydrogens?
- Can the downfield shift caused by oxygen, carbonyl groups, and aromatic rings be explained?
- Can it be explained that exchangeable hydrogens such as OH and NH may become broad or disappear after addition of D2O?
- Can solvent peaks and impurity peaks be distinguished from peaks of the target compound?
- Can the structure be judged in combination with other analytical results such as 13C NMR, IR, and MS?
Example Discussion
In this experiment, the structure of unknown sample X was discussed using its 1H NMR spectrum.
In unknown sample X, a 3H triplet at 1.26 ppm, a 2H quartet at 4.12 ppm, and a 3H singlet at 2.05 ppm were observed.
The integration ratio was 3:2:3 and was considered to correspond to a total of eight hydrogens.
The triplet at 1.26 ppm and quartet at 4.12 ppm form a typical splitting pattern for an ethyl group.
CH3 becomes a triplet because of the two neighboring hydrogens of CH2, while CH2 becomes a quartet because of the three neighboring hydrogens of CH3.
In addition, because the CH2 at 4.12 ppm is farther downfield than an ordinary alkyl CH2, it is considered to be adjacent to an oxygen atom.
The 3H singlet at 2.05 ppm corresponds to a methyl group with no neighboring hydrogens.
Because its chemical shift is near 2 ppm, this methyl group is highly likely to be adjacent to a carbonyl group.
Therefore, unknown sample X can be estimated to contain the partial structures CH3CO- and -OCH2CH3.
Combining these structures suggests that unknown sample X is highly likely to be ethyl acetate.
Furthermore, if a carbonyl carbon is observed near 171 ppm and an OCH2 carbon near 60 ppm in 13C NMR, the presence of an ester structure is supported.
On the other hand, because no aromatic-hydrogen peak is observed near 7 ppm, the sample is not considered to be an aromatic compound such as ethylbenzene.
Possible sources of error include peak overlap, integration-range settings, solvent peaks, impurity peaks, and broadening of exchangeable hydrogens.
For example, when CDCl3 is used, a residual CHCl3 peak appears near 7.26 ppm, so care must be taken not to mistake it for an aromatic peak.
In NMR analysis, it is important to evaluate chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting patterns comprehensively and, when necessary, combine them with results from IR, MS, and other methods.
Summary
In NMR spectra, the surrounding environment of hydrogens can be estimated from chemical shifts, the ratio of the numbers of hydrogens can be read from integration ratios, and the number of neighboring hydrogens can be judged from splitting patterns.
This reference example dealt with chemical shifts, integration, splitting, coupling constants, D2O addition, solvent peaks, impurity peaks, and correspondence with 13C NMR using ethanol, ethyl acetate, ethylbenzene, and unknown sample X as examples.
In a report, rather than explaining each peak separately, it is useful to discuss the entire structure from the relationships among the peaks.
What Is Chemical Shift?
Chemical shift is a value representing the position at which a signal appears in an NMR spectrum.
It is expressed in ppm.
Chemical shift is affected by the electron density surrounding the nucleus and by nearby functional groups, aromatic rings, double bonds, electronegative atoms, and other factors.
Hydrogens in environments with high electron density generally tend to appear upfield, that is, at smaller ppm values.
In contrast, hydrogens affected by oxygen, nitrogen, halogens, carbonyl groups, aromatic rings, and similar groups tend to appear downfield, that is, at larger ppm values.
Example Discussion:
Chemical shift is a value that reflects the electronic environment surrounding a hydrogen atom.
Signals observed downfield in this experiment were considered to originate from hydrogens affected electronically by oxygen atoms, carbonyl groups, aromatic rings, or similar groups.
In contrast, signals on the upfield side were considered to correspond to hydrogens in alkyl groups with relatively high electron density.
How to Read Chemical Shifts
In 1H NMR, the type of hydrogen can be roughly estimated from the chemical-shift range.
Hydrogens in alkyl groups tend to appear at relatively small ppm values, while hydrogens adjacent to oxygen or nitrogen, hydrogens on aromatic rings, aldehyde hydrogens, and carboxylic-acid hydrogens appear farther downfield.
However, chemical shifts change depending on surrounding structure, solvent, concentration, and hydrogen bonding.
Therefore, the structure should not be determined from chemical shifts alone, but judged together with integration ratios and splitting patterns.
| Approximate Chemical Shift | Common Examples of Hydrogen | Point for Discussion |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5–2 ppm | Hydrogens in alkyl groups | Appear relatively upfield |
| 2–3 ppm | Adjacent to a carbonyl group or aromatic ring | Affected by neighboring functional groups |
| 3–5 ppm | Hydrogens adjacent to O or N | Shift downfield because of electronegative atoms |
| 6–8 ppm | Hydrogens on aromatic rings and alkenes | Affected by unsaturated bonds and ring currents |
| 9–10 ppm | Aldehyde hydrogens | Tend to appear strongly downfield |
| Near 10–12 ppm | Carboxylic-acid hydrogens, etc. | May become broad because of hydrogen bonding and exchange |
Example Discussion:
Because a signal was observed near 7 ppm, it may originate from a hydrogen on an aromatic ring.
In addition, signals near 3–4 ppm are considered to originate from hydrogens on carbons adjacent to oxygen atoms.
In this way, the functional groups and bonding environments surrounding hydrogens can be estimated from the positions of chemical shifts.
What Is an Integration Ratio?
An integration ratio is a value representing the ratio of the areas of individual NMR signals.
In 1H NMR, the integration value is, in principle, proportional to the number of hydrogen atoms corresponding to that signal.
Therefore, examining the integration ratio makes it possible to estimate how many hydrogens of each type are present.
For example, if the signal integration ratio of a compound is 3:2:1, the signals may correspond to three, two, and one hydrogen, respectively.
However, integration values do not always become exact integers and may be affected by baseline correction, peak overlap, concentration, relaxation time, and other factors.
Example Discussion:
The integration ratio represents the ratio of the numbers of hydrogens corresponding to the individual signals.
The integration ratio obtained in this experiment generally agreed with the ratio of the numbers of hydrogens expected from the structural formula.
Therefore, the assignments of the observed signals were considered not to contradict the structure of the target compound.
How to Read Integration Ratios
When reading an integration ratio, first check the relative area of each signal.
Next, compare it with the number of hydrogens expected from the structural formula.
For example, a methyl group often corresponds to 3H, a methylene group to 2H, and a methine group to 1H.
If integration values are displayed as 3.00, 2.02, and 1.01, they can be treated as a ratio of 3:2:1.
However, exchangeable hydrogens such as OH and NH may not give accurate integration values.
Integration values may also deviate greatly when peaks overlap.
Example Discussion:
Because the integration value of one signal corresponded to 3H, this signal was considered to originate from the hydrogens of a methyl group.
If another signal corresponds to 2H, it may originate from the hydrogens of a methylene group.
Agreement between the integration ratio and the numbers of hydrogens in the structural formula is important evidence supporting structural estimation.
What Is Splitting?
Splitting in NMR is the phenomenon in which one hydrogen signal appears divided into multiple lines.
It is caused by spin-spin coupling with neighboring hydrogen atoms.
The number of nearby hydrogens can be estimated from the splitting pattern.
As a basic concept, when a hydrogen has n equivalent neighboring hydrogens, its signal is often split into n+1 lines.
For example, if there are three equivalent neighboring hydrogens, the signal splits into four lines; if there are two, it splits into three; and if there is one, it splits into two.
Example Discussion:
Because the observed signal appeared as a triplet, this hydrogen was considered to have two equivalent neighboring hydrogens.
In addition, a signal observed as a quartet corresponds to a structure with three equivalent neighboring hydrogens.
In this way, splitting patterns provide important clues for estimating neighboring relationships among hydrogens.
Discussion of the n+1 Rule
The n+1 rule is a basic rule for predicting the number of split lines from the number of equivalent neighboring hydrogens.
If there are n equivalent neighboring hydrogens, the observed signal is split into n+1 lines.
For example, in an ethyl group, CH3 has two neighboring hydrogens in CH2 and therefore tends to become a triplet, while CH2 has three neighboring hydrogens in CH3 and therefore tends to become a quartet.
However, the n+1 rule is an approximation that is effective in simple cases.
If several types of nonequivalent neighboring hydrogens are present, complex multiplets may occur.
In addition, splitting may be difficult to observe for readily exchangeable hydrogens such as OH and NH.
| Number of Equivalent Neighboring Hydrogens | Number of Split Lines | Name |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | Singlet |
| 1 | 2 | Doublet |
| 2 | 3 | Triplet |
| 3 | 4 | Quartet |
| 4 | 5 | Quintet |
Example Discussion:
According to the n+1 rule, a hydrogen with three equivalent neighboring hydrogens is observed as a quartet.
Because a combination of a quartet and a triplet was observed in this experiment, a CH3-CH2 structure such as an ethyl group may be present in the sample.
Splitting patterns can be used together with integration ratios to estimate partial structures.
How to Interpret Singlets, Doublets, Triplets, and Quartets
A singlet appears when no coupling with neighboring hydrogens is observed.
It may be seen for OCH3 in a methoxy group or for an isolated methyl group.
A doublet tends to appear when there is one equivalent neighboring hydrogen, a triplet when there are two, and a quartet when there are three.
Not only the number of split lines but also the integration ratio and chemical shift are checked together.
For example, if a 3H triplet and a 2H quartet are observed at the same time, this strongly indicates the presence of an ethyl group.
Example Discussion:
Because a triplet corresponding to 3H and a quartet corresponding to 2H were observed, an ethyl group may be present in the sample.
CH3 becomes a triplet because of the two neighboring hydrogens of CH2, while CH2 becomes a quartet because of the three neighboring hydrogens of CH3.
This splitting pattern and integration ratio correspond well to the structure of an ethyl group.
What Is a Coupling Constant?
The coupling constant J is a value representing the spacing between split peaks.
Its unit is Hz.
Signals involved in the same coupling relationship often show the same J value, providing a clue to which hydrogens are coupled with one another.
For example, the CH3 triplet and CH2 quartet of an ethyl group have matching J values because they are coupled to each other.
In alkenes, coupling constants may differ depending on whether the arrangement is cis or trans.
Example Discussion:
Because the coupling constants calculated from the spacing between the split peaks agreed, these signals were considered to originate from coupling between neighboring hydrogens.
In particular, if the same J value is obtained for a triplet and quartet, this supports the conclusion that the CH3 and CH2 groups of an ethyl group are coupled to each other.
Equivalent and Nonequivalent Hydrogens
In NMR, hydrogens in the same chemical environment are equivalent and appear together as the same signal.
In contrast, hydrogens in different chemical environments are nonequivalent and are observed as separate signals.
In highly symmetrical molecules, multiple hydrogens may be equivalent, resulting in fewer signals.
Conversely, in molecules with low symmetry, hydrogens become nonequivalent and the number of signals increases.
The number of signals provides a clue to how many types of hydrogen environments are present in the molecule.
Example Discussion:
The observed number of signals corresponded to the number of types of nonequivalent hydrogens expected from the structural formula.
Hydrogens in the same environment because of molecular symmetry are equivalent and appear as the same signal.
Therefore, agreement between the observed and expected numbers of signals provides evidence supporting the structure of the target compound.
Discussion of Aromatic Hydrogens
Aromatic hydrogens generally appear near 6–8 ppm.
Because of the ring-current effect of the benzene ring, hydrogens on aromatic rings shift downfield.
Their chemical shifts and splitting patterns change depending on the types and positions of substituents.
If an aromatic ring has substituents, the signals in the aromatic region may become complex.
The number of signals and splitting patterns differ among monosubstituted benzene, disubstituted benzene, and symmetrical compounds.
If IR suggests an aromatic ring and NMR shows signals at 6–8 ppm, these findings support the presence of an aromatic ring.
Example Discussion:
Because multiple signals were observed near 6–8 ppm, hydrogens on an aromatic ring were considered to be present in the sample.
Aromatic hydrogens tend to appear downfield because of the ring-current effect of the benzene ring.
In addition, if the integration value in the aromatic region corresponds to the number of aromatic hydrogens in the structural formula, it provides evidence supporting a structure containing an aromatic ring.
NMR Discussion of Alkyl Groups
Hydrogens in alkyl groups generally tend to appear near 0.5–2 ppm.
The chemical shifts and splitting patterns of methyl, methylene, and methine groups change depending on surrounding functional groups and the number of neighboring hydrogens.
If they are close to oxygen, nitrogen, or a carbonyl group, they shift downfield.
Integration ratios and splitting patterns are particularly important in discussing alkyl groups.
A 3H signal may correspond to a methyl group, a 2H signal to a methylene group, and a 1H signal to a methine group.
Example Discussion:
Because a signal corresponding to 3H was observed near 1 ppm, it was considered to originate from the hydrogens of a methyl group.
In addition, if a signal corresponding to 2H is observed nearby and their splitting patterns correspond to each other, an alkyl partial structure such as an ethyl group may be present.
Assignment of alkyl groups must be based not only on chemical shifts but also on integration ratios and splitting.
Discussion of Hydrogens Adjacent to O or N
Hydrogens on carbons adjacent to electronegative atoms such as oxygen and nitrogen tend to shift downfield.
For example, O-CH or O-CH2 in alcohols, ethers, and esters and N-CH in amines may appear near 3–5 ppm.
This is because electronegative atoms attract electrons and reduce the shielding surrounding nearby hydrogens.
If C-O or N-H is confirmed by IR and an alkyl signal appears downfield in NMR, it can be assigned to a hydrogen near the functional group.
Example Discussion:
The signal observed near 3–4 ppm was considered to originate from a hydrogen on a carbon adjacent to an oxygen atom.
Because oxygen has high electronegativity, it decreases the electronic shielding of neighboring hydrogens and shifts their chemical shifts downfield.
If the integration ratio and splitting pattern of this signal agree with the structural formula, they provide evidence supporting a partial structure such as O-CH2 or O-CH3.
Discussion of OH and NH Protons
OH and NH hydrogens are readily affected by concentration, solvent, temperature, hydrogen bonding, and exchange reactions, so their chemical shifts vary easily.
Their peaks may also become broad or their splitting may become difficult to observe.
When D2O is added, OH and NH signals may disappear or weaken, which can be used to confirm exchangeable protons.
Integration values for OH and NH are sometimes difficult to obtain accurately.
Therefore, when dealing with OH and NH signals, the chemical shift and integration ratio should not be treated too rigidly, and they should be discussed together with other structural information.
Example Discussion:
If a broad signal is observed, it may originate from an OH or NH proton.
These hydrogens are readily affected by hydrogen bonding and exchange reactions, so their chemical shifts and peak shapes are prone to change.
Therefore, for assignment of OH and NH signals, it is effective to combine disappearance of the peak after addition of D2O with O-H or N-H absorption in the IR spectrum.
Discussion of Aldehyde Hydrogens
Aldehyde hydrogens generally appear far downfield near 9–10 ppm.
Because they are strongly affected electronically by the carbonyl group, they produce signals at very characteristic positions.
They provide an important clue for confirming the presence of an aldehyde by NMR.
If C=O absorption is present in the IR spectrum and a signal corresponding to 1H is observed near 9–10 ppm in NMR, the possibility of an aldehyde structure becomes higher.
However, the result must be judged together with the integration value and structural formula so that it is not confused with a carboxylic acid or other downfield proton.
Example Discussion:
Because a signal corresponding to 1H was observed near 9–10 ppm, it may originate from an aldehyde hydrogen.
Aldehyde hydrogens tend to appear downfield because of the electronic influence of the carbonyl group.
If C=O absorption is also confirmed in the IR spectrum, these results support the presence of an aldehyde structure.
Discussion of Carboxylic-Acid Hydrogens
The OH proton of a carboxylic acid may appear as a very broad signal far downfield.
It generally appears near 10–12 ppm and may sometimes occur over an even broader range.
Because it is strongly affected by hydrogen bonding and exchange, the peak may become broad or its position may change depending on the measurement conditions.
For confirmation of a carboxylic acid, broad O-H absorption and C=O absorption in IR are also important in addition to the downfield NMR signal.
Combining multiple analytical results rather than relying only on NMR increases reliability.
Example Discussion:
If a broad signal is observed farther downfield than 10 ppm, it may originate from the OH proton of a carboxylic acid.
A carboxylic-acid proton is readily affected by hydrogen bonding and exchange reactions, and its peak may therefore become broad.
If the IR spectrum shows both C=O absorption and broad O-H absorption of a carboxylic acid, these findings provide evidence supporting a carboxylic-acid structure.
Discussion of Solvent Peaks
Deuterated solvents are used for NMR measurements.
However, even deuterated solvents may contain a small amount of residual solvent containing ordinary hydrogen, producing residual solvent peaks.
For example, residual CHCl3 is observed in CDCl3.
It is important not to mistake this for a peak of the target compound.
The position of the solvent peak differs depending on the solvent used.
In a report, the measurement solvent should be clearly stated and solvent-derived peaks excluded from structural assignments.
Water peaks may also appear in the solvent.
Example Discussion:
Some of the peaks observed in the spectrum may be residual peaks originating from the measurement solvent.
Because deuterated solvents contain trace amounts of components with ordinary hydrogen, signals unrelated to the target compound may appear.
Therefore, when assigning peaks, it is necessary to check the positions of residual peaks from the solvent used.
Discussion of Water Peaks and Impurity Peaks
NMR spectra may contain peaks originating from water in the sample or solvent.
The position of the water peak may change depending on the solvent, concentration, and temperature.
Impurity peaks originating from unreacted starting materials, residual solvents, by-products, grease, or insufficiently cleaned equipment may also appear.
If there are peaks that cannot be explained by the structure of the target compound, the possibility of impurities or solvent should be considered.
However, it is not necessary to force an assignment for every small peak.
The discussion should focus primarily on whether the major peaks correspond to the target structure.
Example Discussion:
Possible causes of small signals not expected from the structure of the target compound include residual solvent, unreacted starting material, or contamination by impurities.
A peak originating from water in the measurement solvent may also appear.
Therefore, structural assignment should focus on the major signals, while unexplained small peaks should be considered as possibly originating from impurities.
Discussion When Peaks Overlap
In NMR, peaks may overlap when multiple hydrogens appear at similar chemical shifts.
Signals are particularly likely to overlap in the aromatic region and complex alkyl regions.
When peaks overlap, it becomes difficult to accurately read integration values and splitting patterns.
When overlap is present, integration values should not be interpreted too rigidly.
If possible, an enlarged spectrum, two-dimensional NMR, measurement in another solvent, comparison with literature spectra, or similar methods should be used.
Example Discussion:
Because the signals in the aromatic region overlapped, it was difficult to clearly read the splitting pattern of each hydrogen.
When peaks overlap, the integration value represents the total of multiple hydrogens, making it difficult to accurately separate the numbers of individual hydrogens.
Therefore, the chemical-shift range, total integration value, and correspondence with the structural formula were evaluated comprehensively.
Discussion When Peaks Are Broad
Causes of broad NMR peaks include exchange of OH or NH, sample concentration, viscosity, slow molecular motion, impurities, magnetic-field inhomogeneity, and insufficient dissolution of the sample.
In polymers and highly viscous samples, molecular motion becomes slower and peaks may broaden.
OH and NH peaks readily become broad because of hydrogen bonding and proton exchange.
When a peak is broad, not only poor measurement but also the effects of exchangeable protons and molecular motion can be discussed.
Example Discussion:
Possible causes of some signals being observed as broad peaks include exchange reactions of OH or NH protons and the effects of hydrogen bonding.
In addition, if the sample is not sufficiently dissolved or if the solution is highly viscous, molecular motion may be restricted and the peaks may become broad.
Therefore, increased peak width may reflect the state of the sample or intermolecular interactions.
Comparison of the NMR Spectra of Starting Materials and Products
In organic synthesis experiments, it is important to compare the NMR spectra of the starting material and product.
Check whether signals that should disappear as a result of the reaction have disappeared and whether signals characteristic of the product have appeared.
In esterification, acetylation, reduction, oxidation, substitution reactions, and similar reactions, the chemical shifts of hydrogens near functional groups change.
If peaks originating from the starting material remain, the reaction may be incomplete, purification may be insufficient, or starting material may be mixed with the product.
If peaks originating from the product appear as expected and the integration ratios also agree, this supports the conclusion that the target substance was obtained.
Example Discussion:
In the NMR spectrum after the reaction, signals characteristic of the starting material decreased and new signals corresponding to the product were observed.
This was considered to be because the chemical environments of the hydrogens changed as a result of the reaction.
In addition, because the integration ratios of the product signals agreed with the ratios of the numbers of hydrogens expected from the structural formula, the results support the structure of the target product.
NMR Discussion of Ester Synthesis
In ester synthesis, an alcohol and carboxylic acid react to form an ester.
In NMR, signals from methylene or methyl groups adjacent to oxygen, signals from ester substituents, and changes in OH protons from the starting material are examined.
In ethyl esters, a 3H triplet and a 2H quartet are often observed.
If partial structures characteristic of an ester are confirmed by NMR and C=O and C-O absorptions are also confirmed by IR, ester formation is more strongly supported.
If unreacted alcohol or carboxylic acid remains, peaks originating from the starting materials may remain.
Example Discussion:
Because a triplet corresponding to 3H and a quartet corresponding to 2H were observed, an ester structure containing an ethyl group may be present.
In addition, CH2 adjacent to O tends to appear downfield and corresponds to a partial structure of an ester.
If ester C=O absorption is also confirmed in the IR spectrum, this provides evidence supporting the progress of the esterification reaction.
NMR Discussion of Acetanilide Synthesis
In amide compounds such as acetanilide, aromatic hydrogens, methyl hydrogens of the acetyl group, and the NH proton are important.
Aromatic hydrogens appear near 6–8 ppm, while the CH3 of the acetyl group appears relatively upfield.
The NH proton may appear broad because of hydrogen bonding and solvent effects.
Compared with the starting material aniline, amidation changes the electronic environment around nitrogen and may cause changes in the aromatic region and NH signal.
Confirmation together with the amide C=O absorption in IR strengthens the evidence for the product.
Example Discussion:
Because multiple signals were observed in the aromatic region and a signal corresponding to the methyl hydrogens of the acetyl group was also confirmed, an acetanilide structure may have formed.
The NH proton may appear broad because of hydrogen bonding and exchange.
If amide C=O absorption is confirmed in the IR spectrum, the NMR results can be combined with it to support amide formation.
How to Proceed With Structural Estimation
When estimating a structure from NMR, first check the number of signals.
Next, estimate the types of hydrogens from the chemical shift of each signal.
Then confirm the numbers of hydrogens from the integration ratios and estimate the numbers of neighboring hydrogens from the splitting patterns.
Finally, check whether this information is consistent with the structural formula.
NMR is a very powerful structural-analysis method, but complete structural determination may be difficult from 1H NMR alone for complex molecules.
When necessary, results from 13C NMR, IR, MS, two-dimensional NMR, melting-point measurements, TLC, and other methods are combined.
Example of How to Write Structural Estimation:
First, the types of nonequivalent hydrogens were checked from the number of observed signals.
Next, aromatic hydrogens, alkyl hydrogens, hydrogens adjacent to oxygen, and other hydrogens were assigned based on the chemical shift of each signal.
Furthermore, because the integration ratios and splitting patterns corresponded to the numbers of hydrogens and neighboring relationships expected from the structural formula, the spectrum was judged not to contradict the structure of the target compound.
How to Write a Peak-Assignment Table
In an NMR spectrum report, preparing a peak-assignment table makes the discussion easier to understand.
The table includes chemical shifts, integration values, splitting patterns, assigned hydrogens, and the basis for assignment.
It is not necessary to force assignments for every small impurity peak.
The table should focus on the major peaks needed to explain the structure of the target compound.
| Chemical Shift | Integration Ratio | Splitting | Example Assignment | Point for Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5–2 ppm | 3H, 2H, etc. | Triplet, quartet, etc. | Alkyl group | Consider partial structures by combining integration ratios and splitting |
| 3–5 ppm | 3H, 2H, 1H, etc. | Singlet, multiplet, etc. | Hydrogens adjacent to O or N | Appear downfield because of electronegative atoms |
| 6–8 ppm | Number of aromatic hydrogens | Multiplet, etc. | Aromatic hydrogens | Tends to become complex depending on substitution pattern |
| 9–10 ppm | 1H | Singlet, doublet, etc. | Aldehyde hydrogen | Appears downfield because of the carbonyl group |
Example Explanation of a Peak-Assignment Table:
The major observed signals were organized in a table based on their chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting patterns.
The assignments of each signal corresponded to the numbers of hydrogens and neighboring hydrogens in the structural formula.
Therefore, the obtained NMR spectrum was considered to generally agree with the structure of the target compound.
What Is Difficult to Determine From NMR Alone?
NMR is extremely useful for structural estimation, but it cannot necessarily determine everything by itself.
When peaks overlap, it becomes difficult to accurately read integration ratios and splitting patterns.
In addition, when trace impurities or isomers are mixed in, it may be difficult to judge them from the major peaks alone.
Combining NMR with other analytical results increases reliability, such as IR for confirmation of functional groups, MS for molecular weight, melting point or HPLC for purity, and TLC for reaction progress.
In a report, a good discussion explains how far the NMR results support the structure and where their limitations lie.
Example Discussion:
Major signals corresponding to the target compound could be confirmed from the NMR spectrum, but because some peaks overlapped, detailed splitting patterns for some hydrogens could not be clearly determined.
Therefore, confirmation of the structure must be combined with results from IR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, melting-point measurement, and similar methods.
NMR is useful for confirming hydrogen environments, but there are limitations to determining purity or the complete structure from NMR alone.
Comparison With Literature Spectra
When discussing an NMR spectrum, comparison with literature spectra or spectra of standard substances improves reliability.
If chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting patterns generally agree with literature values, the sample is more likely to be the target compound.
However, chemical shifts may change slightly depending on the measurement solvent, concentration, temperature, and instrument conditions.
When comparing with literature values, it is not necessary to demand perfect agreement; instead, confirm that the major signals do not contradict the structure.
OH and NH protons in particular may change greatly depending on conditions.
Example Discussion:
When the obtained NMR spectrum was compared with literature values, the chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting patterns of the major signals generally agreed.
Therefore, the sample was considered highly likely to be the target compound.
On the other hand, differences in the measurement solvent, concentration, temperature, and hydrogen bonding may explain slight deviations observed in some signals.
When NMR Results Can Be Considered Good
NMR results can be considered good when signals corresponding to the target compound are clearly observed and the chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting patterns agree with the structural formula.
It is also important that there be few extra peaks originating from starting materials or impurities and that the major peaks can be explained after excluding solvent peaks and water peaks.
In synthesis experiments, if signals originating from the starting material decrease or disappear and signals characteristic of the product are observed, this provides evidence that the reaction has proceeded.
However, because it may be difficult to evaluate purity completely using NMR alone, the result should be judged together with other analytical results.
Example Discussion:
In the NMR spectrum obtained in this experiment, chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting patterns corresponding to the target compound were confirmed.
In addition, because signals characteristic of the starting material did not remain prominently, the reaction was considered to have generally proceeded.
Because the major signals do not contradict the structural formula, the sample obtained in this experiment is highly likely to be the target compound.
Example Discussion When the Experiment Did Not Go Well
When an NMR measurement does not go well, possible causes are considered from results such as weak peaks, broad peaks, overlapping peaks, incorrect integration ratios, large solvent or water peaks, remaining starting-material peaks, or inability to confirm the target peaks.
Organizing the causes into sample preparation, insufficient dissolution, concentration, insufficient purification, measurement solvent, impurities, and peak overlap makes the discussion easier.
Example Discussion:
In this experiment, some of the signals corresponding to the target compound were unclear, and the integration ratios did not completely agree with the theoretical values.
Possible causes include the presence of unreacted starting material or residual solvent in the sample and the inability to accurately read integration values because multiple signals overlapped.
In addition, low sample concentration or insufficient dissolution may also affect peak intensity and line width.
Discussion When Integration Ratios Do Not Agree
If the integration ratios do not agree with the numbers of hydrogens expected from the structural formula, possible causes include peak overlap, insufficient baseline correction, exchange of OH or NH, inclusion of solvent peaks, impurities, concentration, and relaxation-time effects.
Particularly in complex aromatic regions, multiple signals may overlap and make the integration value appear larger.
Small deviations in integration ratios are not unusual.
What is important is whether the ratios of the major signals are substantially consistent with the structural formula and whether the cause of any deviation can be explained.
Example Discussion:
Possible causes of the integration ratios not completely agreeing with the theoretical values include peak overlap and the effects of baseline correction.
In the aromatic region in particular, multiple hydrogen signals readily overlap, making it difficult to separate individual integration values accurately.
In addition, because OH and NH protons are affected by exchange, their integration values may not be represented accurately.
Discussion When Splitting Is Difficult to Observe
If splitting is difficult to observe, possible causes include peak overlap, increased line width, instrument resolution, concentration, exchange reactions, and complex coupling caused by nonequivalent hydrogens.
In the aromatic region, multiple hydrogens couple with one another and may form multiplets that are difficult to explain using a simple n+1 rule.
If splitting cannot be clearly read, it may be treated as a multiplet rather than being forced into a classification such as singlet or doublet.
In structural estimation, chemical shift and integration ratio may be given priority, with splitting used as supplementary information.
Example Discussion:
The splitting patterns of some signals could not be clearly read.
Possible causes include overlap of multiple signals at similar chemical shifts and complex coupling with neighboring nonequivalent hydrogens.
In such cases, the peaks should not be forced into an explanation based only on a simple n+1 rule; instead, they should be treated as multiplets and assigned by combining chemical shifts and integration ratios.
Discussion When the Number of Peaks Differs From the Expected Number
If the number of peaks differs from that predicted from the structural formula, possible causes include overlooking equivalent hydrogens, insufficient consideration of symmetry, peak overlap, impurities, mixtures of isomers, remaining starting material, and inclusion of solvent peaks.
In symmetrical molecules, the number of signals may be smaller than expected.
Conversely, if more peaks than expected are present, the sample may contain impurities or unreacted starting material.
The judgment should take into account not only the structural formula but also the state of purification and reaction conditions.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason the observed number of signals was greater than expected is that impurities or unreacted starting material remained.
On the other hand, if fewer signals than expected are observed, multiple hydrogens may have become equivalent because of molecular symmetry, or peaks may overlap.
Therefore, when discussing the number of signals, both the symmetry of the structural formula and the purity of the sample must be checked.
How to Write Points for Improvement
In a discussion of NMR spectra, including not only sources of error but also points for improvement makes the report easier to organize.
Improvements can be considered separately for sample preparation, purification, measurement, and analysis.
Improvements to Sample Preparation
- Purify the sample sufficiently
- Remove residual solvents
- Dry the sample completely
- Dissolve it completely in the measurement solvent
- Adjust the concentration appropriately
- Clean the NMR tube
Improvements to Measurement
- Select an appropriate deuterated solvent
- Check solvent peaks and water peaks
- Increase the number of scans when necessary
- Check whether the sample is turbid
- Match the measurement conditions to those used for literature values
Improvements to Analysis
- Organize major peaks in an assignment table
- Interpret chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting together
- Exclude solvent peaks and water peaks from consideration
- Take peak overlap into account
- Compare with literature spectra
- Do not make a definitive judgment from NMR alone; combine it with IR, MS, and other methods
Example of How to Write Points for Improvement:
To obtain a more accurate NMR spectrum, the sample must be sufficiently purified before measurement and residual solvents and unreacted starting materials removed.
It is also important to completely dissolve the sample in a deuterated solvent and measure it at an appropriate concentration.
During analysis, solvent peaks and water peaks must be excluded, and chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting patterns must be assigned by comparing them with the structural formula.
Difference Between a Superficial Discussion and a Good Discussion
In a discussion of NMR spectra, simply writing that “there was a peak” or “the integration ratio matched” results in a superficial discussion.
A good discussion relates chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting patterns to the structural formula and explains, with evidence, which hydrogens they originate from.
| Superficial Discussion | Good Discussion |
|---|---|
| There was a peak near 7 ppm. | Because multiple signals were observed near 7 ppm, they were considered to originate from hydrogens on an aromatic ring. If the integration value corresponds to the number of aromatic hydrogens in the structural formula, it provides evidence supporting a structure containing an aromatic ring. |
| The integration ratio matched. | Because the integration ratios of the individual signals agreed with the ratios of the numbers of hydrogens expected from the structural formula, the assignments of the observed signals were considered not to contradict the structure of the target compound. |
| It was a triplet. | A signal observed as a triplet indicates the presence of two equivalent neighboring hydrogens and may originate from the CH3 of a CH3-CH2 structure. |
| There was an extra peak. | Small peaks that cannot be explained by the structure of the target compound may originate from residual solvent, unreacted starting material, impurities, or water peaks, so they must be judged by comparison with solvent-peak tables and the spectrum of the starting material. |
Examples of Expressions That Can Be Used in Reports
The following expressions can be used when writing the results and discussion of NMR spectra.
Adjust the necessary parts according to your own experimental results.
- Chemical shifts reflect the electronic environment surrounding each hydrogen atom.
- Signals appearing downfield are considered to originate from hydrogens affected by electronegative atoms, aromatic rings, or carbonyl groups.
- Integration ratios indicate the ratios of the numbers of hydrogens corresponding to the individual signals.
- Because the integration ratio agreed with the ratio of the numbers of hydrogens in the structural formula, the result supports the structure of the target compound.
- Splitting patterns provide clues for estimating the number of neighboring hydrogens.
- According to the n+1 rule, a triplet indicates the presence of two equivalent neighboring hydrogens.
- OH and NH protons are readily affected by exchange and may produce broad peaks.
- Solvent peaks and water peaks must be distinguished from signals of the target compound.
- When peaks overlap, it becomes difficult to accurately read integration ratios and splitting patterns.
- The structure should not be determined from the NMR spectrum alone but judged in combination with other analytical results such as IR and MS.
Points to Check When Discussing NMR Spectra
Checking the following points before writing the report makes the discussion easier to write.
- Have the nucleus measured and measurement solvent been stated?
- Have the chemical shifts of the major signals been recorded?
- Have the integration ratios been compared with the numbers of hydrogens in the structural formula?
- Has the number of neighboring hydrogens been explained from the splitting patterns?
- Have coupling constants been checked when necessary?
- Have solvent peaks and water peaks been distinguished?
- Have the possibilities of impurity peaks and starting-material peaks been considered?
- Has the effect of peak overlap been taken into account?
- Have the spectra of the starting material and product been compared?
- Has the spectrum been compared with literature spectra?
- Are the points that are difficult to determine from NMR alone understood?
- Do the points for improvement correspond to the sources of error?
Summary
NMR spectroscopy is an analytical method for estimating the structures of compounds by examining the chemical environments of hydrogens and carbons in molecules.
In 1H NMR, the types of hydrogens can be read from chemical shifts, the numbers of hydrogens from integration ratios, and the numbers of neighboring hydrogens from splitting patterns.
Combining this information makes it possible to judge whether the spectrum agrees with the structure of the target compound.
Chemical shifts are affected by functional groups and the surrounding electronic environment, integration ratios indicate ratios of the numbers of hydrogens, and splitting reflects coupling with neighboring hydrogens.
However, OH and NH protons are readily affected by exchange and may produce broad peaks or inaccurate integration values.
Attention must also be paid to solvent peaks, water peaks, impurity peaks, and peak overlap.
In a report, rather than simply writing that “a peak appeared,” relate the chemical shifts, integration ratios, and splitting patterns to the structural formula and explain, with evidence, which hydrogens they originate from.
NMR is extremely useful for structural estimation, but when necessary, it is important to combine it with other analytical results such as IR, MS, melting point, and TLC to produce a more reliable discussion.
