In HPLC analysis, components in a liquid are separated using a column, and retention time, peak area, peak height, resolution, calibration curves, and other parameters are used to identify and quantify components.
It is an analytical method used in a wide range of chemistry experiments, including the analysis of pharmaceuticals, food components, dyes, amino acids, organic acids, caffeine, vitamins, reaction products, and mixed samples.
In a discussion of HPLC analysis, it is not sufficient simply to write that “a peak appeared,” “the retention time matched,” or “the concentration was determined from the calibration curve.”
It is necessary to explain what retention time means, why resolution is important, how peak area is used for quantitation, and how the linearity of the calibration curve and sources of error should be evaluated.
This article clearly explains, as examples of discussions that can be used in HPLC laboratory reports, how to interpret retention time, resolution, and calibration curves, quantitation using peak area, the effects of mobile-phase and column conditions, sources of error, and points for improvement.
Note:
This article is a reference intended to assist with discussions of HPLC analysis results obtained in instrumental-analysis experiments, analytical-chemistry experiments, organic-chemistry experiments, and biochemistry experiments at universities and similar institutions.
For the actual column, mobile phase, flow rate, detection wavelength, injection volume, standard solutions, calibration curves, internal standards, instrument operation, and safety precautions, always follow the instructions in your university’s laboratory manual and those given by your instructor or TA.
- What Is HPLC Analysis?
- Main Items to Include in the Results
- Reference Experimental Values and Calculation Examples for HPLC Analysis
- Reference Experimental Conditions
- HPLC Measurement Results for a Standard Mixture
- Example of Component Identification Using Retention Time
- Concept of Resolution
- Example Calculation of Resolution
- Comparison of Resolution Between Peaks
- Calibration Curve for Caffeine Standard Solutions
- Example Calculation of Caffeine Concentration in an Unknown Sample
- Example Calculation Including Dilution Factor
- Calibration Curve for Benzoic Acid and Quantitation of an Unknown Sample
- Example Measurement Outside the Calibration-Curve Range
- Changes in Retention Time Caused by Mobile-Phase Composition
- Changes in Retention Time Caused by Flow Rate
- Examples of Abnormal Peak Shapes
- Example Confirmation by Standard Addition
- Example of How to Write the Results
- Points for Connecting the Results to the Discussion
- Example Discussion
- Summary
- How to Read a Chromatogram
- What Is Retention Time?
- Causes of Changes in Retention Time
- What Is Peak Area?
- Difference Between Peak Height and Peak Area
- What Is Resolution?
- Discussion When Resolution Is Low
- What Is a Calibration Curve?
- Discussion of Calibration-Curve Linearity
- Discussion of the External-Standard Method
- Discussion of the Internal-Standard Method
- Effect of the Mobile Phase
- Effect of the Stationary Phase and Column
- Effect of Flow Rate
- Effect of Column Temperature
- Effect of Detection Wavelength
- Effect of Injection Volume
- Discussion When Peaks Overlap
- Discussion When Peaks Are Broad
- Discussion When Peaks Tail
- Discussion of the Baseline
- Discussion of Noise
- Importance of Standard Substances
- Discussion of the Standard-Addition Method
- Errors Caused by Sample Preparation
- Discussion of Matrix Effects
- Causes of Quantitative Values Being Too High
- Causes of Quantitative Values Being Too Low
- When HPLC Analysis Can Be Judged to Have Given Good Results
- Example Discussion When the Experiment Did Not Go Well
- How to Write Points for Improvement
- Difference Between a Superficial Discussion and a Good Discussion
- Examples of Expressions That Can Be Used in Reports
- Points to Check When Discussing HPLC Analysis
- Summary
What Is HPLC Analysis?
HPLC stands for high-performance liquid chromatography.
A sample solution is carried into a column by the mobile phase, and components are separated by utilizing differences in the strength of their interactions with the stationary phase.
The separated components are measured by a detector and appear as peaks on the chromatogram.
Whereas GC is suitable for analyzing components that are readily vaporized, HPLC can also be used easily for heat-sensitive components, nonvolatile components, relatively large molecules, polar compounds, and similar substances.
In HPLC, estimation of components using retention time, quantitation using peak area, and evaluation of separation using resolution are important.
Example Discussion:
In HPLC analysis, components in the sample show different interactions with the stationary phase and mobile phase inside the column, so each component is detected at a different retention time.
Because multiple peaks were observed in this experiment, the sample was considered to contain multiple components.
Components can be estimated by comparing retention times with those of standard substances, and quantitation can be performed using peak areas.
Main Items to Include in the Results
In HPLC results, organize the sample name, analyte, standard substances, column used, mobile phase, flow rate, detection wavelength, injection volume, retention time, peak area, resolution, calibration curve, quantitative values, and other information.
Because differences in HPLC conditions can greatly change retention time and peak shape, it is important to clearly state the measurement conditions.
Main Items to Include in the Results
- Sample name
- Analyte
- Standard substance
- Internal standard substance
- Column used
- Type of stationary phase
- Mobile-phase composition
- Mobile-phase pH
- Flow rate
- Column temperature
- Type of detector
- Detection wavelength
- Injection volume
- Retention time
- Peak area
- Peak height
- Peak width
- Resolution
- Calibration-curve equation
- Correlation coefficient
- Quantitative value of the unknown sample
- Sources of error and points for improvement
Example of How to Write the Results:
Standard substances and the unknown sample were measured under the same HPLC conditions, and the retention times and peak areas were read from the obtained chromatograms.
Because the retention time of the peak in the unknown sample was close to that of the standard substance, the peak may have originated from the target component.
In addition, the concentration of the target component in the unknown sample was determined using a calibration curve prepared from standard solutions.
Reference Experimental Values and Calculation Examples for HPLC Analysis
Here, the process of identifying and quantifying components using retention time, peak area, resolution, and calibration curves obtained by HPLC analysis is organized using reference experimental values.
In HPLC, components in a sample are separated by a column and recorded as peaks by a detector.
Retention time provides a clue for component identification, while peak area provides an approximate indication of the amount of a component.
In addition, the concentration of an unknown sample can be determined by preparing a calibration curve from standard solutions.
Reference Experimental Conditions
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Measurement target | Caffeine, benzoic acid, acetaminophen, unknown sample |
| Analytical method | Reversed-phase HPLC |
| Column | C18 column |
| Mobile phase | Water:methanol = 60:40 |
| Flow rate | 1.0 mL/min |
| Detection wavelength | 254 nm |
| Injection volume | 10 μL |
| Evaluation items | Retention time, peak area, resolution, calibration curve, unknown-sample concentration, sources of error |
HPLC Measurement Results for a Standard Mixture
A reference example is shown for measurement of a standard mixture containing caffeine, benzoic acid, and acetaminophen.
| Peak | Estimated Component | Retention Time | Peak Width | Peak Area | How to Interpret the Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acetaminophen | 2.35 min | 0.18 min | 248000 | Elutes first |
| 2 | Caffeine | 4.80 min | 0.22 min | 365000 | Moderate retention |
| 3 | Benzoic acid | 7.15 min | 0.26 min | 285000 | Elutes last |
If the retention time of a peak in an unknown sample is close to the retention time of a standard substance measured under the same conditions, that component may be present.
However, identification should not be based on retention time alone, and standard addition or confirmation under different conditions should be performed when necessary.
Example of Component Identification Using Retention Time
Suppose unknown sample A was measured under the same HPLC conditions and the following peaks were obtained.
| Unknown Peak | Retention Time | Comparison With Standard Substance | Estimated Component | Guide for Judgment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak 1 | 2.36 min | Acetaminophen 2.35 min | Acetaminophen | Almost identical |
| Peak 2 | 4.82 min | Caffeine 4.80 min | Caffeine | Almost identical |
| Peak 3 | 7.12 min | Benzoic acid 7.15 min | Benzoic acid | Almost identical |
Because the retention times of the peaks in unknown sample A are close to those of the standard substances, the sample is considered highly likely to contain all three components.
Concept of Resolution
Resolution is an indicator of how well two adjacent peaks are separated.
The greater the resolution, the less likely the peaks are to overlap and the easier they are to quantify.
Resolution Rs = 2(tR2 − tR1) ÷ (w1 + w2)
Here, tR1 and tR2 are the retention times of the two peaks, and w1 and w2 are their respective peak widths.
Example Calculation of Resolution
The resolution between acetaminophen and caffeine is calculated.
The retention time of acetaminophen is 2.35 min and its peak width is 0.18 min, while the retention time of caffeine is 4.80 min and its peak width is 0.22 min.
Rs = 2(4.80 − 2.35) ÷ (0.18 + 0.22)
Rs = 4.90 ÷ 0.40 = 12.25
This value is sufficiently large, so the two peaks can be judged to be well separated.
Comparison of Resolution Between Peaks
| Peak Combination | Difference in Retention Time | Sum of Peak Widths | Resolution Rs | How to Interpret the Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetaminophen / Caffeine | 2.45 min | 0.40 min | 12.25 | Sufficiently separated |
| Caffeine / Benzoic acid | 2.35 min | 0.48 min | 9.79 | Sufficiently separated |
| Closely spaced peaks after changing conditions | 0.18 min | 0.32 min | 1.13 | Somewhat likely to overlap |
| Nearly coeluting peaks | 0.05 min | 0.30 min | 0.33 | Insufficient separation |
If the resolution is low, errors are more likely to occur when reading peak areas, making accurate quantitation difficult.
Calibration Curve for Caffeine Standard Solutions
A reference example is shown in which caffeine standard solutions at multiple concentrations were measured and the relationship between concentration and peak area was examined.
| Standard Solution | Caffeine Concentration | Retention Time | Peak Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard 1 | 5 mg/L | 4.80 min | 91000 |
| Standard 2 | 10 mg/L | 4.80 min | 182000 |
| Standard 3 | 20 mg/L | 4.81 min | 365000 |
| Standard 4 | 30 mg/L | 4.81 min | 548000 |
| Standard 5 | 40 mg/L | 4.82 min | 730000 |
In this reference example, the relationship between caffeine concentration and peak area is treated as the following calibration curve.
Peak area = 18250 × Concentration (mg/L)
Therefore, the concentration of an unknown sample is determined using the following equation.
Concentration (mg/L) = Peak area ÷ 18250
Example Calculation of Caffeine Concentration in an Unknown Sample
If the caffeine peak area of unknown sample A is 456000, the concentration is determined using the calibration curve.
Caffeine concentration = 456000 ÷ 18250 = 25.0 mg/L
Therefore, the caffeine concentration in unknown sample A is determined to be 25.0 mg/L.
Example Calculation Including Dilution Factor
If the sample was diluted before HPLC measurement, the concentration in the measured solution determined from the calibration curve is multiplied by the dilution factor to obtain the concentration in the original sample.
| Condition | Peak Area | Concentration in Measured Solution | Dilution Factor | Concentration in Original Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No dilution | 456000 | 25.0 mg/L | 1× | 25.0 mg/L |
| 5-fold dilution | 365000 | 20.0 mg/L | 5× | 100 mg/L |
| 10-fold dilution | 274000 | 15.0 mg/L | 10× | 150 mg/L |
For diluted samples, forgetting to apply the dilution factor results in a substantial underestimation of the concentration.
Calibration Curve for Benzoic Acid and Quantitation of an Unknown Sample
A reference example is also shown in which a calibration curve was prepared for benzoic acid using standard solutions.
| Concentration | Peak Area | How to Interpret the Calibration Curve |
|---|---|---|
| 2 mg/L | 42000 | Low-concentration range |
| 5 mg/L | 105000 | Within the linear range |
| 10 mg/L | 210000 | Within the linear range |
| 20 mg/L | 420000 | Within the linear range |
| 30 mg/L | 630000 | Within the linear range |
In this reference example, the calibration curve for benzoic acid is treated as follows.
Peak area = 21000 × Concentration (mg/L)
If the peak area of benzoic acid in the unknown sample is 315000,
Benzoic acid concentration = 315000 ÷ 21000 = 15.0 mg/L
Example Measurement Outside the Calibration-Curve Range
If the peak area of an unknown sample exceeds the range of the calibration curve, extrapolating directly may produce a large error.
| Measurement Condition | Peak Area | Apparent Concentration | Problem | Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Within calibration-curve range | 456000 | 25.0 mg/L | Few problems | Can be calculated directly |
| High-concentration sample | 1120000 | 61.4 mg/L | Exceeds standard-solution range | Dilute and remeasure |
| After dilution | 365000 | 20.0 mg/L | Within calibration-curve range | Apply the dilution factor |
Quantitation is basically performed within the linear range confirmed using the standard solutions.
High-concentration samples are appropriately diluted before measurement.
Changes in Retention Time Caused by Mobile-Phase Composition
In reversed-phase HPLC, increasing the proportion of organic solvent generally shortens the retention time of hydrophobic components.
A reference example is shown for changing the water:methanol ratio.
| Mobile Phase | Acetaminophen | Caffeine | Benzoic Acid | How to Interpret Separation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water:methanol = 70:30 | 3.10 min | 6.45 min | 10.80 min | Strong retention and long analysis time |
| Water:methanol = 60:40 | 2.35 min | 4.80 min | 7.15 min | Standard conditions |
| Water:methanol = 50:50 | 1.85 min | 3.30 min | 4.75 min | Short retention times |
| Water:methanol = 40:60 | 1.40 min | 2.20 min | 2.95 min | Peaks tend to become closer |
If too much organic solvent is added in order to shorten the analysis time, separation between peaks may become poorer.
Changes in Retention Time Caused by Flow Rate
Increasing the flow rate causes components to pass through the column more quickly, shortening the retention time.
However, an excessively high flow rate may affect separation and peak shape.
| Flow Rate | Caffeine Retention Time | Peak Width | Peak Shape | How to Interpret the Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 mL/min | 9.60 min | 0.36 min | Broad | Long analysis time |
| 1.0 mL/min | 4.80 min | 0.22 min | Good | Standard conditions |
| 1.5 mL/min | 3.25 min | 0.20 min | Relatively good | Shorter analysis time |
| 2.0 mL/min | 2.45 min | 0.24 min | Slightly disturbed | Possible reduction in separation |
Because flow rate affects both analysis time and separation, simply increasing it is not always preferable.
Examples of Abnormal Peak Shapes
Peak shape is also important in HPLC.
If peaks broaden to the left or right or trail before or after the peak, area calculation and separation are affected.
| Peak Shape | Appearance | Possible Cause | Effect on Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good peak | Nearly symmetrical | Appropriate conditions | Easy area calculation |
| Tailing | Trails toward the back | Column deterioration, secondary interactions, inappropriate pH | Affects resolution and area |
| Fronting | Broadens toward the front | Overloading, excessive injection volume | Retention time becomes unclear |
| Peak splitting | One component appears as two peaks | Solvent mismatch, column abnormality, poor injection | Quantitation becomes unstable |
When peak area is used for quantitation, poor peak shape makes the result more dependent on how the area is integrated.
Example Confirmation by Standard Addition
A standard substance can be added to an unknown sample and measured to confirm whether a peak in the unknown sample truly corresponds to the target component.
If it is the target component, the area of the peak at the same retention time increases.
| Condition | Caffeine Retention Time | Peak Area | How to Interpret the Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown sample only | 4.82 min | 456000 | Candidate caffeine peak |
| After addition of caffeine standard | 4.81 min | 638000 | The same peak increases |
| After addition of another component standard | 4.82 min | 455000 | No change |
If only the peak at the same retention time increases after addition of the standard substance, the peak is more likely to correspond to the target component.
Example of How to Write the Results
When the standard mixture was measured by HPLC, peaks were obtained at retention times of 2.35, 4.80, and 7.15 min.
Based on the measurement results for the standard substances, these peaks were considered to correspond to acetaminophen, caffeine, and benzoic acid, respectively.
Because peaks were also observed at 2.36, 4.82, and 7.12 min in unknown sample A, the sample is considered highly likely to contain these three components.
A calibration curve was prepared using caffeine standard solutions, and the relationship between peak area and concentration was expressed as “Peak area = 18250 × Concentration.”
Because the caffeine peak area of unknown sample A was 456000, the caffeine concentration was calculated as 456000 ÷ 18250 = 25.0 mg/L.
The resolution between acetaminophen and caffeine was 12.25, while that between caffeine and benzoic acid was 9.79.
Both values were sufficiently large, so the peaks were judged to be well separated.
Therefore, under these conditions, quantitation using peak areas is considered relatively reliable.
Points for Connecting the Results to the Discussion
In a discussion of HPLC analysis, it is important to explain retention time, peak area, resolution, calibration curves, and peak shape in relation to one another.
- Can retention time be compared with standard substances to provide a basis for component identification?
- Can the need for confirmation by standard addition or different conditions be explained rather than making a definitive judgment from retention time alone?
- Can a calibration curve be prepared from the relationship between peak area and concentration?
- Can the concentration be determined by substituting the peak area of the unknown sample into the calibration curve?
- If the sample was diluted before measurement, has the dilution factor been correctly taken into account?
- Can it be explained that low resolution increases errors in peak-area determination?
- Can the effects of mobile-phase composition and flow rate on retention time and separation be discussed?
- Can it be explained that peak tailing, fronting, and splitting can lead to quantitative errors?
- Can it be explained that samples outside the calibration-curve range must be diluted and remeasured?
Example Discussion
In this experiment, a standard mixture and unknown sample A were analyzed using reversed-phase HPLC.
In the standard mixture, acetaminophen, caffeine, and benzoic acid eluted at 2.35, 4.80, and 7.15 min, respectively.
Because peaks with retention times close to these were observed in unknown sample A, the same components may have been present.
For caffeine, a calibration curve was prepared from the concentrations and peak areas of the standard solutions.
Peak area was proportional to concentration, and the calibration curve was expressed as “Peak area = 18250 × Concentration.”
Substituting the caffeine peak area of 456000 for unknown sample A into this equation gave a concentration of 25.0 mg/L.
In this way, HPLC can be analyzed by combining identification based on retention time with quantitation based on peak area.
The calculated resolution between acetaminophen and caffeine was 12.25, while that between caffeine and benzoic acid was 9.79.
These values were sufficiently large, and overlap between the peaks was considered small.
Therefore, under these conditions, errors in reading peak area were considered relatively small and the separation was judged suitable for quantitation.
Changing the mobile-phase composition caused the retention time to change greatly.
Increasing the proportion of methanol weakened retention on the reversed-phase column and caused each component to elute more quickly.
However, if the proportion of organic solvent is increased too much, the spacing between peaks becomes smaller and separation may become poorer.
Therefore, it is necessary to balance shortening the analysis time with maintaining sufficient separation.
Possible sources of error include variation in injection volume, deviations in mobile-phase composition, changes in flow rate, column deterioration, and deterioration of peak shape.
In particular, if a peak tails, the quantitative value may change depending on the integration range used for the peak area.
In addition, if a high-concentration sample exceeding the calibration-curve range is measured directly, linearity may not be maintained and the error may become large, so the sample must be appropriately diluted and remeasured.
Summary
In HPLC analysis, candidate components are judged from retention time, and concentration is determined by substituting peak area into a calibration curve.
If resolution is sufficient, overlap between peaks is small and the reliability of quantitation increases.
This reference example used a standard mixture of acetaminophen, caffeine, and benzoic acid and an unknown sample to examine retention time, resolution, calibration curves, concentration calculations, mobile-phase conditions, and the effects of peak shape.
In a report, it is useful to discuss retention time, comparison with standard substances, peak area, calibration curves, dilution factor, resolution, and errors caused by measurement conditions in relation to one another.
How to Read a Chromatogram
A chromatogram obtained by HPLC is a graph with time on the horizontal axis and detector signal intensity on the vertical axis.
When a component reaches the detector, the signal increases and appears as a peak.
The position of the peak indicates retention time, while the size of the peak is related to the amount of the component.
When examining a chromatogram, check the number of peaks, retention times, peak areas, peak shapes, separation, and stability of the baseline.
If peaks overlap, errors are more likely to occur in identification and quantitation.
In addition, if a peak trails, is broad, or is asymmetric, there may be a problem with the column, mobile phase, or sample conditions.
Example Discussion:
Because multiple peaks were observed on the chromatogram, the sample was considered to contain multiple components.
The retention times of the peaks differed because each component interacted differently with the stationary phase and mobile phase and therefore moved through the column at a different rate.
Because peak area corresponds to the amount of a component, it can be used for quantitation in combination with a calibration curve prepared using standard substances.
What Is Retention Time?
Retention time is the time from injection of the sample until a component reaches the detector and appears as a peak.
In HPLC, the more strongly a component is retained by the stationary phase, the longer its retention time.
Components that are readily dissolved in the mobile phase and interact weakly with the stationary phase elute more quickly.
Retention time depends not only on the properties of the component but also on the type of column, mobile-phase composition, pH, flow rate, column temperature, and other conditions.
Therefore, when a component is estimated using retention time, the standard substance and unknown sample must be measured under the same conditions.
Example Discussion:
Because the retention time of the peak in the unknown sample almost agreed with that of the standard substance, this peak is highly likely to originate from the target component.
Because retention time depends on interactions between the component and the stationary and mobile phases, comparison with a standard substance under the same HPLC conditions is important.
However, another component may elute at the same time even if the retention times agree, so complete identification cannot be made from retention time alone.
Causes of Changes in Retention Time
Retention time is readily affected by HPLC conditions.
If the composition of the mobile phase changes, the ease of component elution also changes.
In reversed-phase HPLC, increasing the proportion of organic solvent tends to cause many hydrophobic components to elute more quickly and shorten their retention times.
Mobile-phase pH, flow rate, column temperature, column deterioration, contamination inside the column, and differences in sample solvent also affect retention time.
If the retention time differs from that of the standard substance, slight differences in the measurement conditions must be considered.
Example Discussion:
Possible causes of the slight difference in retention time from that observed during measurement of the standard substance include changes in mobile-phase composition and flow rate.
In reversed-phase HPLC, increasing the proportion of organic solvent may cause hydrophobic components to remain more readily in the mobile phase and shorten their retention time.
In addition, changes in column temperature and pH also affect retention time, so it is important to keep measurement conditions constant.
What Is Peak Area?
Peak area is the total area of a peak on a chromatogram.
In many cases, peak area is proportional to the amount of the detected component.
In HPLC quantitation, a calibration curve is prepared from the relationship between standard-solution concentration and peak area, and the concentration of an unknown sample is determined by substituting its peak area into the calibration curve.
Correct determination of peak area requires good peak separation and appropriate baseline setting.
If peaks overlap or the baseline is unstable, errors occur in the area values.
In addition, if the detection wavelength is not suitable for the target component, the peak area becomes small and quantitative accuracy may decrease.
Example Discussion:
Because peak area corresponds to the amount of the detected target component, it can be used for quantitative analysis.
In this experiment, a calibration curve was prepared from the relationship between the peak areas and concentrations of the standard solutions, and the concentration was determined using the peak area of the unknown sample.
However, peak area is affected by baseline setting and peak overlap, so the state of separation must be checked.
Difference Between Peak Height and Peak Area
Peak height represents the maximum signal value of a peak.
Peak area, on the other hand, represents the total signal from the entire peak.
If a peak is sharp and symmetrical, peak height can also serve as an approximate indicator of component amount, but if peak width or shape changes, height alone does not represent component amount accurately.
In HPLC quantitation, using peak area generally provides a more stable evaluation.
However, peak area is also affected by separation and baseline conditions, so it is important to check peak shape before analysis.
Example Discussion:
Peak height represents the maximum signal of a peak but does not fully reflect changes in peak width.
Peak area, on the other hand, represents the total signal of the peak and is therefore suitable as an indicator for evaluating component amount.
However, if peaks overlap or the baseline is disturbed, errors also occur in the calculation of peak area.
What Is Resolution?
Resolution is an indicator of how well two adjacent peaks are separated.
The higher the resolution, the less overlap there is between peaks and the greater the reliability of identification and quantitation.
If the resolution is low, it becomes difficult to determine peak areas accurately, causing errors in quantitative values.
Resolution is related to the difference in retention time between two peaks and their peak widths.
Even if the retention times are sufficiently separated, broad peaks are more likely to overlap.
Conversely, even if the retention times are close, sharp peaks are easier to separate.
Resolution Rs is evaluated from the difference in retention time and peak widths of two peaks.
Example Discussion:
Because the resolution between the target component and the adjacent component was sufficient, the peak area was considered to have been determined relatively accurately.
On the other hand, if the resolution is low, peaks overlap and the signal from another component may be included in the area of the target component.
Therefore, in HPLC quantitation, not only retention time but also the state of peak separation must be checked.
Discussion When Resolution Is Low
If the resolution is low, the peak of the target component may be close to or overlapping with another component.
In this condition, identification based on retention time becomes uncertain and peak areas are difficult to determine accurately.
Quantitative values may be overestimated or underestimated.
To improve resolution, mobile-phase composition, pH, flow rate, column temperature, column type, and gradient conditions are reviewed.
In particular, the organic-solvent ratio and pH of the mobile phase greatly affect component retention and selectivity.
Example Discussion:
Because the peak of the target component was not sufficiently separated from the adjacent peak, an error may have occurred in the calculation of peak area.
If resolution is low, the signal from another component is included in the peak area and the concentration of the target component cannot be determined accurately.
To improve separation, the mobile-phase composition, pH, flow rate, and column conditions must be adjusted.
What Is a Calibration Curve?
A calibration curve is a graph prepared by measuring standard solutions of known concentration and plotting the relationship between concentration and peak area or peak height.
In HPLC quantitation, a calibration curve is often prepared from the peak areas of standard solutions, and the concentration of an unknown sample is determined from its peak area.
To use a calibration curve, the unknown sample must be evaluated within the concentration range of the standard solutions.
If the peak area of the unknown sample is outside the calibration-curve range, it is desirable to dilute or concentrate the sample and remeasure it.
The correlation coefficient, intercept, outliers, and accuracy of standard-solution preparation are also checked.
Example Discussion:
Because the relationship between standard-solution concentration and peak area showed good linearity, quantitation using peak area was considered possible within this concentration range.
If the peak area of the unknown sample is within the calibration-curve range, the concentration can be determined by interpolation, so the quantitative result is considered relatively reliable.
On the other hand, extrapolation outside the calibration-curve range may produce a larger error.
Discussion of Calibration-Curve Linearity
The linearity of a calibration curve is closely related to the reliability of HPLC quantitation.
If standard-solution concentration and peak area show a linear relationship, the detector response is considered proportional to concentration within that range.
The closer the correlation coefficient is to 1, the easier it is to judge the linearity as high.
However, it is insufficient to judge only from the correlation coefficient.
The concentration range of the standard solutions, variation at low concentrations, saturation of detector response at high concentrations, outliers, and the size of the intercept must also be checked.
Particularly at high concentrations, the detector may exceed its linear range and peak area may no longer be proportional to concentration.
Example Discussion:
Because the correlation coefficient of the calibration curve was high, the concentration of the standard solutions and peak area were considered to show a good linear relationship.
However, if points on the high-concentration side deviate from the line, possible causes include exceeding the detector-response range or excessively high sample concentration.
Data within the concentration range in which linearity has been confirmed must be used for quantitation.
Discussion of the External-Standard Method
The external-standard method is a method in which standard solutions and unknown samples are measured separately, and the concentration of the unknown sample is determined using a calibration curve prepared from the standard solutions.
The procedure is relatively simple and is used in many HPLC experiments.
However, it has the disadvantage of being susceptible to variation in injection volume and changes in instrument condition.
For accurate quantitation using the external-standard method, standard solutions and unknown samples must be measured under the same conditions and variation caused by injection volume and measurement order must be minimized.
Using an autosampler provides better reproducibility than manual injection.
Example Discussion:
In the external-standard method, the concentration of the unknown sample is determined from the relationship between the peak area and concentration of the standard solutions.
However, because the standard solutions and unknown samples are injected separately, variation in injection volume affects the peak area.
Therefore, to perform accurate quantitation by the external-standard method, the injection volume and measurement conditions must be kept constant and reproducibility must be confirmed by repeated measurements.
Discussion of the Internal-Standard Method
The internal-standard method is a method in which a fixed amount of an internal-standard substance is added to the sample and standard solutions, and quantitation is performed using the ratio of the peak area of the target component to that of the internal standard.
It has the advantage of making it easier to correct for variation in injection volume and losses during sample preparation.
The internal-standard substance must not already be present in the sample, must be sufficiently separated from the target component, and must be stable under the measurement conditions.
If the internal-standard peak overlaps with the target component or another component, an accurate area ratio cannot be determined.
Example Discussion:
In the internal-standard method, the peak area of the target component is corrected using the peak area of the internal-standard substance, so the effect of variation in injection volume can be reduced.
Therefore, more reproducible quantitation than with the external-standard method can be expected.
However, the internal-standard substance must be sufficiently separated from the target component and must not originally be present in the sample.
Effect of the Mobile Phase
The mobile phase greatly affects retention time and resolution in HPLC.
In reversed-phase HPLC, water is often combined with organic solvents such as methanol or acetonitrile.
As the proportion of organic solvent increases, hydrophobic components become more soluble in the mobile phase and their retention times may become shorter.
The pH of the mobile phase is also important.
For acidic and basic compounds, the ionization state changes with pH, which changes interactions with the stationary phase and retention time.
Therefore, it is important to keep the composition and pH of the mobile phase constant.
Example Discussion:
Changes in the organic-solvent ratio of the mobile phase alter the retention time and resolution of components.
In reversed-phase HPLC, the higher the organic-solvent ratio, the more readily hydrophobic components remain in the mobile phase and the shorter their retention times may become.
In addition, the ionization state of acidic and basic components changes with pH and also affects retention, so the mobile-phase conditions must be kept constant.
Effect of the Stationary Phase and Column
The stationary phase of an HPLC column is closely related to component separation.
In reversed-phase columns, hydrophobic stationary phases such as C18 and C8 are commonly used, and more hydrophobic components tend to be retained more strongly.
On the other hand, normal-phase columns, ion-exchange columns, and size-exclusion columns use different separation principles.
If a column deteriorates or becomes contaminated, retention-time shifts, increased peak width, tailing, and reduced resolution may occur.
The condition of the column directly affects the reliability of HPLC results.
Example Discussion:
In reversed-phase HPLC, more hydrophobic components tend to interact more strongly with hydrophobic stationary phases such as C18 and therefore have longer retention times.
Thus, differences in retention time among components can be explained by differences in hydrophobicity and interaction with the stationary phase.
However, if the column is deteriorated, peak shape may worsen and resolution and quantitative accuracy may decrease.
Effect of Flow Rate
Flow rate is the speed at which the mobile phase moves through the column.
As the flow rate increases, components reach the detector more quickly and retention times become shorter.
However, if the flow rate is too high, components may elute before sufficient separation occurs and the resolution may decrease.
Conversely, if the flow rate is too low, the analysis time becomes longer and peaks may broaden.
In HPLC, the flow rate is set while considering the balance between analysis time and resolution.
Example Discussion:
Increasing the flow rate shortens retention time because components move more quickly through the column.
However, if the flow rate is too high, sufficient separation between components may not occur and resolution may decrease.
On the other hand, if the flow rate is too low, the analysis time becomes long, so the flow rate must be set while balancing resolution and analysis time.
Effect of Column Temperature
Column temperature affects retention time, peak shape, and resolution.
As temperature increases, the viscosity of the mobile phase decreases, and diffusion of components and interactions with the stationary phase also change.
In many cases, an increase in temperature tends to shorten retention time.
If the temperature is not constant, retention time fluctuates and comparison between standard substances and unknown samples becomes difficult.
Particularly when precise quantitation or retention-time comparison is performed, it is important to keep the column temperature constant.
Example Discussion:
Changes in column temperature affect component retention time and peak shape.
As the temperature increases, interactions with the stationary phase and the viscosity of the mobile phase change, and the retention time may become shorter.
Therefore, when comparing the retention times of standard substances and unknown samples, the column temperature must be kept constant.
Effect of Detection Wavelength
In HPLC using a UV detector or photodiode-array detector, selection of the detection wavelength is important.
If measurement is performed at a wavelength where the target component absorbs strongly, sensitivity increases and the peak area becomes larger.
On the other hand, measurement at a wavelength where absorption is weak produces smaller peaks and lowers quantitative accuracy.
However, if other components in the sample also absorb at the same wavelength, interfering peaks may become larger.
It is important to select a wavelength at which absorption by the target component is strong and absorption by interfering components is small.
Example Discussion:
Detection wavelength greatly affects HPLC peak sensitivity.
When measurement is performed at a wavelength strongly absorbed by the target component, peak area increases and the component becomes easier to detect even at low concentration.
On the other hand, if other components also absorb at the same wavelength, interfering peaks become larger, so a wavelength selective for the target component must be chosen.
Effect of Injection Volume
In HPLC, injection volume affects peak area and peak shape.
A larger injection volume increases peak area, but if the volume is too large, the column becomes overloaded, peaks broaden or show fronting, and resolution decreases.
If the injection volume is too small, peaks become small and more susceptible to noise.
In quantitative analysis, it is important to use the same injection volume for standard solutions and unknown samples.
Even when an autosampler is used, bubbles or precipitates in the sample may affect injection volume and peak area.
Example Discussion:
Variation in injection volume may have caused the variation in peak area.
Increasing the injection volume increases the amount of component introduced into the column and therefore increases peak area.
However, if the injection volume is too large, column overloading may distort the peak shape and cause errors in the quantitative value.
Discussion When Peaks Overlap
If peaks overlap in HPLC, multiple components may be eluting at similar retention times.
When peaks overlap, it becomes difficult to accurately determine the area of the target component and errors occur in quantitative values.
The reliability of identification based on retention time also decreases.
To improve peak overlap, the mobile-phase composition, pH, flow rate, column temperature, column type, gradient conditions, and detection wavelength are reviewed.
Adding a standard substance and checking the position at which the peak increases can also provide a clue for identification.
Example Discussion:
If the peak of the target component overlaps with that of another component, the peak area may contain signals from components other than the target component.
As a result, the concentration of the target component may be overestimated.
For accurate quantitation, the mobile-phase and column conditions must be adjusted to obtain conditions in which the target component is sufficiently separated from other components.
Discussion When Peaks Are Broad
Causes of broad peaks include reduced column efficiency, excessive injection volume, unsuitable sample solvent, inappropriate flow rate, column deterioration, diffusion, and dead volume in instrument tubing.
Broad peaks reduce resolution and also reduce the accuracy of reading peak area and retention time.
If peak width is broad, the column condition, injection volume, sample solvent, flow rate, and instrument tubing are checked.
In particular, if the sample solvent is stronger than the mobile phase, the peak may broaden or become distorted.
Example Discussion:
Possible causes of the broad peak include an excessive injection volume or reduced column efficiency.
As peak width increases, separation from adjacent peaks becomes poorer and resolution and quantitative accuracy decrease.
In addition, if the sample solvent differs greatly from the mobile phase, the peak shape may deteriorate, so the sample-preparation conditions must also be checked.
Discussion When Peaks Tail
The phenomenon in which a peak trails toward the back is called tailing.
Tailing may occur when the component adsorbs to active sites inside the column, the mobile-phase pH is inappropriate, the column has deteriorated, or the interaction between the sample and stationary phase is too strong.
When tailing occurs, the endpoint of the peak becomes unclear and errors occur in area calculation.
For acidic and basic compounds, adjustment of pH or use of a buffer may improve tailing.
Example Discussion:
One possible cause of tailing observed in the target-component peak is adsorption of the component to active sites inside the column.
If tailing is large, it becomes difficult to define the endpoint of the peak area and errors occur in quantitative values.
Adjustment of mobile-phase pH, confirmation of column condition, and review of sample concentration may improve the peak shape.
Discussion of the Baseline
The baseline is the reference signal line in regions where no peaks are present.
The more stable the baseline, the easier it is to determine peak area accurately.
If the baseline slopes, fluctuates, drifts, or contains large noise, errors occur in peak-area calculation.
Causes of baseline disturbance in HPLC include insufficient degassing of the mobile phase, temperature changes, insufficient detector stability, changes in mobile-phase composition, substances eluting from the column, contamination, and bubbles.
Particularly in UV detection, absorption by the mobile phase and bubbles affect the baseline.
Example Discussion:
If the baseline was unstable, an error may have occurred in the calculation of peak area.
In HPLC quantitation, peak area is calculated as the signal relative to the baseline, so if the baseline is sloped, the area may be overestimated or underestimated.
Possible causes of baseline disturbance include insufficient degassing of the mobile phase, bubbles, and insufficient detector stability.
Discussion of Noise
Noise is unwanted fluctuation contained in the detector signal.
If noise is large, detection of small peaks and area calculation become difficult.
In low-concentration samples, the peak signal is small, so the relative effect of noise becomes larger and quantitative accuracy decreases.
Causes of noise include detector instability, contamination of the mobile phase, bubbles, pump pulsation, temperature changes, column contamination, and electrical noise.
If noise is large, filtration and degassing of the mobile phase, stabilization of the instrument, and checking the column and detector are necessary.
Example Discussion:
If noise is large, it becomes difficult to accurately detect peaks of low-concentration components.
Particularly when peak area is small, the relative error caused by noise increases and variation in quantitative values becomes larger.
Therefore, when analyzing trace components, the mobile phase must be sufficiently degassed and filtered and the instrument must be stabilized.
Importance of Standard Substances
In HPLC analysis, standard substances can be used to confirm retention time and prepare calibration curves.
By measuring a standard substance under the same conditions and comparing its retention time with a peak in the unknown sample, the target component can be estimated.
However, retention time alone does not provide complete identification, so standard addition or measurement under other conditions is also performed when necessary.
In quantitative analysis, the accuracy of standard-solution concentration is extremely important.
If there is an error in preparation of the standard solution, the entire calibration curve shifts, causing a systematic error in the concentration of the unknown sample.
Example Discussion:
Using standard substances makes it possible to estimate components by comparing retention times and to quantify components using peak areas.
Agreement between the retention time of the standard substance and the peak in the unknown sample provides evidence supporting the presence of the target component.
In addition, if the concentration of the standard solution is not accurate, the calibration curve shifts and an error also occurs in the quantitative value of the unknown sample.
Discussion of the Standard-Addition Method
The standard-addition method is a method in which a known amount of standard substance is added to an unknown sample and the increase in the peak is checked.
If the matrix in the sample affects detection sensitivity or retention, the standard-addition method may be effective.
It can also provide a clue for confirming whether a peak in the unknown sample is the target component.
If only the peak area at the same retention time increases when the standard substance is added, the peak is more likely to originate from the target component.
However, care must be taken not to distort the peak shape or make the concentration excessively high through addition.
Example Discussion:
If addition of a standard substance to the unknown sample causes an increase in the peak area at the same retention time as the target peak, the peak is highly likely to originate from the target component.
The standard-addition method is an effective confirmation method when retention time alone is insufficient for identification.
It also has the advantage of allowing the response to be confirmed directly within the sample even when matrix effects are present.
Errors Caused by Sample Preparation
In HPLC analysis, sample preparation greatly affects quantitative results.
Errors in dilution factor, mistakes in standard-solution preparation, adsorption during filtration, sample decomposition, incomplete dissolution, precipitation, bubbles, and matrix effects can all be sources of error.
In particular, if the target component adsorbs to the filtration membrane, the measured concentration may become low.
In addition, if the sample solvent differs greatly from the mobile phase, peak shape may deteriorate.
In HPLC, it may be desirable to prepare the sample in the mobile phase or in a solvent having a composition close to that of the mobile phase.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason the quantitative value was lower than expected is that the target component adsorbed to the filtration membrane or container during sample preparation.
In addition, if the sample was not completely dissolved, the amount of target component actually introduced into the column would be smaller and the peak area would decrease.
Therefore, complete dissolution, appropriate filtration, and accurate dilution are important during sample preparation.
Discussion of Matrix Effects
Matrix effects refer to the influence of components other than the target component in a sample on detection, separation, or quantitation.
In complex samples such as foods, pharmaceuticals, biological samples, and environmental samples, coexisting components may cause peak overlap, changes in retention time, and changes in detection sensitivity.
If matrix effects are present, the response of an unknown sample may not agree with that of a calibration curve prepared using pure standard solutions.
Countermeasures include the standard-addition method, internal-standard method, pretreatment, extraction, solid-phase extraction, and dilution.
Example Discussion:
Matrix effects caused by coexisting components in the sample may explain why the quantitative value differed from the literature or labeled value.
If coexisting components overlap with the target-component peak or change detection sensitivity, the peak area may not accurately reflect the actual concentration.
Therefore, in complex samples, using the standard-addition method or internal-standard method to correct for matrix effects is effective.
Causes of Quantitative Values Being Too High
Causes of an HPLC quantitative value being higher than the actual value include peak overlap, errors in baseline setting, mistakes in preparation of standard-solution concentration, errors in dilution-factor calculations, absorption by coexisting components, and excessive injection volume.
Particularly in UV detection, if a component other than the target component also absorbs at the same detection wavelength, the peak area or signal may become larger.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason the quantitative value was high is that another component’s peak overlapped with that of the target component.
In this case, the peak area includes signal from components other than the target component, resulting in overestimation of concentration.
In addition, if the baseline is set too low, the calculated peak area becomes larger and the quantitative value may become high.
Causes of Quantitative Values Being Too Low
Causes of an HPLC quantitative value being lower than the actual value include loss during sample preparation, adsorption to filtration membranes or containers, decomposition, incomplete dissolution, insufficient injection volume, inappropriate detection wavelength, and underestimation of peak area.
If the sample is unstable, the target component may decompose between sample preparation and measurement, reducing the peak area.
In addition, if the target component is strongly adsorbed to the column or the peak tails, area calculation may become inaccurate.
Sample-storage conditions and pretreatment conditions also affect the quantitative value.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason the quantitative value was low is that part of the target component was lost during sample preparation.
For example, adsorption to a filtration membrane or container wall, decomposition of the sample, or incomplete dissolution reduces the amount of target component introduced into the column.
As a result, the peak area becomes smaller and the concentration determined from the calibration curve may be lower than the actual value.
When HPLC Analysis Can Be Judged to Have Given Good Results
HPLC analysis can be judged to have given good results when the peak of the target component appears clearly at the same retention time as the standard substance, is sufficiently separated from adjacent peaks, has a good peak shape, and the calibration curve shows linearity.
It is also important that the peak area of the unknown sample be within the calibration-curve range and that repeated measurements show reproducibility.
Agreement of retention time is important for identification, while the validity of peak area and the calibration curve, resolution, and baseline stability are important for quantitation.
The less peak overlap and tailing there is, the easier it is to judge the results as reliable.
Example Discussion:
In this experiment, the peak of the target component appeared at almost the same retention time as that of the standard substance and was sufficiently separated from adjacent peaks.
In addition, the calibration curve of the standard solutions showed good linearity, and the peak area of the unknown sample was also within the calibration-curve range.
From these results, identification and quantitation of the target component by HPLC analysis were considered generally valid.
Example Discussion When the Experiment Did Not Go Well
When HPLC analysis does not go well, possible causes are considered from results such as shifted retention time, overlapping peaks, broad peaks, tailing, disturbed baseline, a nonlinear calibration curve, or a quantitative value that deviates greatly.
Organizing the possible causes into mobile phase, column, flow rate, pH, sample preparation, injection volume, detection wavelength, and baseline makes the discussion easier.
Example Discussion:
In this experiment, the peak of the target component overlapped with an adjacent peak and the resolution was insufficient.
Therefore, it was difficult to accurately determine the peak area, and the quantitative value may have contained an error.
Possible causes include mobile-phase composition or pH that was unsuitable for separation of the components, or deterioration of the column condition.
More accurate quantitation requires reviewing the mobile-phase and column conditions and sufficiently separating the target component.
How to Write Points for Improvement
In a discussion of HPLC analysis, including not only sources of error but also points for improvement makes the report easier to organize.
Improvements can be organized by dividing them into sample preparation, separation conditions, measurement conditions, quantitative methods, and instrument management.
Improvements to Sample Preparation
- Prepare standard solutions accurately
- Manage dilution factors accurately
- Dissolve the sample completely
- Filter the sample when necessary
- Check for adsorption to the filtration membrane
- Prevent sample decomposition
- Use a sample solvent similar to the mobile phase
Improvements to Separation Conditions
- Adjust the mobile-phase composition
- Optimize the mobile-phase pH
- Adjust the flow rate
- Keep the column temperature constant
- Consider another column
- Review the gradient conditions
- Find conditions that avoid peak overlap
Improvements to Measurement and Analysis
- Keep the injection volume constant
- Select an appropriate detection wavelength
- Degas and filter the mobile phase
- Confirm baseline stability
- Confirm the linear range of the calibration curve
- Confirm that the unknown sample is within the calibration-curve range
- Consider the internal-standard method or standard-addition method
- Perform multiple measurements and show the average value and variation
Example of How to Write Points for Improvement:
To improve the quantitative accuracy of HPLC analysis, the standard solutions and unknown sample must be prepared accurately, and the peak area of the unknown sample must be adjusted so that it falls within the linear range of the calibration curve.
In addition, it is important to optimize the mobile-phase composition, pH, flow rate, and column conditions so that the peak of the target component does not overlap with other components.
By confirming baseline stability and peak shape and using the internal-standard method or standard-addition method when necessary, more reliable quantitation becomes possible.
Difference Between a Superficial Discussion and a Good Discussion
In a discussion of HPLC analysis, simply writing that “a peak appeared,” “the retention times were the same,” or “a calibration curve was obtained” results in a superficial discussion.
A good discussion relates retention time, resolution, peak area, calibration curves, mobile-phase conditions, and sources of error.
| Superficial Discussion | Good Discussion |
|---|---|
| The retention times matched. | Because the retention time of the peak in the unknown sample agreed with that of the standard substance, the peak may originate from the target component. However, because another component with a similar retention time may be present, confirmation by standard addition or under different conditions is also effective. |
| The peaks were separated. | Because the resolution between the target component and adjacent component was sufficient, the peak area could be determined relatively accurately. The higher the resolution, the greater the reliability of identification and quantitation. |
| The calibration curve was linear. | Because standard-solution concentration and peak area showed a good linear relationship, quantitation using peak area was considered valid within this range. |
| The value deviated. | The deviation in the quantitative value may have been caused by peak overlap, errors in standard-solution preparation, variation in injection volume, adsorption or decomposition of the sample, matrix effects, or baseline setting. |
Examples of Expressions That Can Be Used in Reports
The following expressions can be used when writing the results and discussion of HPLC analysis.
Adjust the necessary parts according to your own experimental results.
- Retention time indicates the time for a component to be retained in the column and reach the detector.
- Because the retention time of the peak in the unknown sample agreed with that of the standard substance, the presence of the target component was suggested.
- Retention time changes depending on mobile-phase composition, pH, flow rate, column temperature, and column condition.
- Peak area corresponds to the amount of the detected component and can be used for quantitative analysis.
- If resolution is low, signals from other components are included in the peak area and errors occur in quantitative values.
- Because the calibration curve showed linearity, quantitation using peak area was possible within this concentration range.
- If the peak area of an unknown sample is outside the calibration-curve range, the sample must be diluted or concentrated and remeasured.
- Baseline disturbance affects calculation of peak area.
- Matrix effects may cause detector response to differ between standard solutions and unknown samples.
- Using the internal-standard method or standard-addition method makes it easier to correct for variation in injection volume and matrix effects.
Points to Check When Discussing HPLC Analysis
Checking the following points before writing the report makes the discussion easier to write.
- Are the HPLC conditions clearly stated?
- Has retention time been compared with that of a standard substance?
- Has identification avoided relying on retention time alone?
- Has the resolution been checked?
- Have the effects of peak overlap been considered?
- Has the basis for using peak area for quantitation been explained?
- Have the calibration-curve equation and correlation coefficient been shown?
- Has it been confirmed that the unknown sample is within the calibration-curve range?
- Have the effects of mobile-phase composition and pH been considered?
- Have the effects of flow rate, column temperature, and detection wavelength been considered?
- Have sample preparation and matrix effects been considered?
- Do the points for improvement correspond to the sources of error?
Summary
In HPLC analysis, components in a sample are separated by a column, and retention time, peak area, resolution, and calibration curves are used for component identification and quantitation.
Retention time is the time required for a component to reach the detector and can be used to estimate components by comparison with standard substances.
Because peak area corresponds to the amount of the detected component, it can be used for quantitation with a calibration curve.
However, retention time changes depending on mobile-phase composition, pH, flow rate, column temperature, and column condition.
Peak area is also affected by peak separation, baseline, injection volume, detection wavelength, sample preparation, and matrix effects.
Therefore, in a discussion of HPLC analysis, it is important not to make a definitive identification based only on agreement of retention time, but also to check resolution, comparison with standard substances, and standard addition when necessary.
In a report, rather than simply writing that “a peak appeared” or “the concentration was determined from the calibration curve,” discuss retention time, resolution, peak area, calibration-curve linearity, mobile-phase conditions, and sources of error in relation to one another.
For accurate quantitation, it is necessary to confirm that the target peak is sufficiently separated, the unknown sample is within the calibration-curve range, and the baseline is stable.
