Genetic analysis is a method used to examine DNA base sequences, the presence or absence and length of specific regions, and differences among individuals. It is widely used for purposes such as species identification, assessment of genetic diversity, estimation of phylogenetic relationships, and genotype determination.
In educational experiments, analysis commonly proceeds through DNA extraction, amplification of a target region by PCR, confirmation of amplification products by agarose gel electrophoresis, and comparison of base sequences.
PCR specifically amplifies the target DNA region. Electrophoresis separates amplified DNA fragments according to length, allowing approximate base-pair sizes to be estimated by comparison with a DNA ladder.
Furthermore, comparing the obtained sequence with a reference sequence can reveal differences such as single-base substitutions, insertions, and deletions. Comparing sequences from multiple samples also makes it possible to calculate sequence identity and genetic distance.
This article assumes genetic analysis using confirmed safe educational DNA samples, plant- or food-derived samples, or publicly available sequence data, and covers an introduction, precautions, items to record, sample experimental values, calculations, sources of error, example results, and example discussion.
Note:
This article is a study reference for preparing biology and molecular biology laboratory reports. The DNA concentrations, band sizes, base sequences, sequence identities, mutation positions, and other values shown are illustrative examples and are not actual measurements.
Use safe DNA samples prepared for education, food- or plant-derived samples, or samples designated by the supervising instructor.
Do not independently collect or analyze human-derived samples, clinical specimens, or pathogen-derived samples.
Use UV illumination devices, nucleic-acid staining reagents, electrophoresis equipment, PCR instruments, and related equipment according to the instructor’s directions and the equipment manuals.
Voltage is applied to the gel tank and power supply during electrophoresis. Do not open the lid or touch the electrodes while power is on.
Genetic information may include information related to individuals or biological lineages. Handle sample names, sequence data, and analysis results carefully.
Basics of Genetic Analysis
DNA Extraction
DNA extraction is the process of isolating DNA from cells or tissues. The concentration and purity of the extracted DNA affect the success of subsequent PCR and sequence analysis.
PCR
PCR repeatedly amplifies a specific DNA region located between primers. If the target region is present in the sample and the reaction proceeds properly, an amplification product of the expected length is obtained.
Electrophoresis
Because DNA is negatively charged, it migrates toward the positive electrode in an electric field. Smaller DNA fragments generally move through the gel faster and travel farther than larger fragments.
Sequence Comparison
The analyzed sequence is aligned with a reference sequence or sequences from other samples to examine matching and mismatching bases. Differences in the sequence can reveal substitutions, insertions, and deletions.
Genotype Determination
By comparing bases at specific positions or the lengths of DNA fragments, the alleles carried by an individual or sample can be estimated.
Main Items to Record in the Results
- Sample name
- Sample origin
- Gene analyzed
- Target region
- DNA extraction method
- Amount of extracted DNA
- DNA concentration
- A260/A280
- A260/A230
- PCR reaction volume
- Primers used
- Expected amplicon size
- Number of PCR cycles
- Annealing temperature
- Electrophoresis conditions
- Gel concentration
- Type of DNA ladder
- Presence or absence of bands
- Number of bands
- Band positions
- Estimated fragment sizes
- Nonspecific bands
- Primer dimers
- Positive-control result
- Negative-control result
- Sequence length
- Number of analyzable bases
- Number of bases matching the reference sequence
- Sequence identity
- Mutation positions
- Base substitutions
- Insertions and deletions
- Presence or absence of amino-acid substitutions
- Genotype
- Replicate results
Sample Experimental Values
DNA Concentration and Purity
| Sample | DNA concentration (ng/µL) | A260/A280 | A260/A230 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample A | 42.5 | 1.82 | 2.03 |
| Sample B | 36.8 | 1.76 | 1.88 |
| Sample C | 51.2 | 1.85 | 2.10 |
| Positive control | 25.0 | 1.80 | 2.00 |
Sample PCR Conditions
| Item | Sample condition |
|---|---|
| Target gene | Educational plant DNA marker region |
| Expected amplicon size | About 520 bp |
| Reaction volume | 20 µL |
| Template DNA amount | 25 ng |
| Number of cycles | 35 |
| Annealing temperature | 58°C |
| Gel concentration | 1.5% |
| Electrophoresis time | 30 min |
Sample Electrophoresis Results
| Lane | Sample | Main band | Nonspecific band | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | DNA ladder | 100–1000 bp | None | Size reference |
| 1 | Sample A | About 520 bp | Weak band at about 250 bp | Amplification present |
| 2 | Sample B | About 520 bp | None | Amplification present |
| 3 | Sample C | About 700 bp | None | Long allele |
| 4 | Positive control | About 520 bp | None | Normal |
| 5 | Negative control | None | Faint band at about 80 bp | No main amplification |
Sample DNA Ladder Migration Distances
| Fragment size (bp) | Migration distance (mm) |
|---|---|
| 1000 | 18 |
| 700 | 24 |
| 500 | 30 |
| 400 | 34 |
| 300 | 39 |
| 200 | 46 |
| 100 | 56 |
Sample Sequence Comparison Values
| Item | Sample value |
|---|---|
| Reference sequence length | 480 bp |
| Analyzable length of Sample A | 472 bp |
| Matching bases | 468 bases |
| Mismatching bases | 4 bases |
| Substitutions | 3 sites |
| Single-base deletion | 1 site |
| Sequence identity | 99.15% |
Sample Sequence Differences
| Position | Reference sequence | Sample sequence | Type of mutation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | G | A | Single-base substitution |
| 173 | C | T | Single-base substitution |
| 266 | A | G | Single-base substitution |
| 351 | T | Deletion | Single-base deletion |
Sample Genotype Determination
| Sample | Detected bands | Estimated genotype |
|---|---|---|
| Sample A | 520 bp only | Short-allele homozygote |
| Sample B | 520 bp and 700 bp | Heterozygote |
| Sample C | 700 bp only | Long-allele homozygote |
Sample Replicate Measurements
| Replicate | Estimated size of Sample A (bp) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 515 |
| 2 | 522 |
| 3 | 518 |
| Mean | 518.3 |
Calculation Methods
Total DNA Amount
For a DNA concentration of 42.5 ng/µL and a solution volume of 50 µL:
Total DNA amount = DNA concentration × solution volume
= 42.5 ng/µL × 50 µL
= 2125 ng
= 2.125 µg
Volume of DNA Solution Added to PCR
If 25 ng of template DNA is required and the DNA concentration is 42.5 ng/µL:
Required volume = required DNA amount ÷ DNA concentration
= 25 ng ÷ 42.5 ng/µL
≈ 0.59 µL
Concentration After Dilution
If a 42.5 ng/µL DNA solution is diluted fivefold:
Concentration after dilution = original concentration ÷ dilution factor
= 42.5 ÷ 5
= 8.5 ng/µL
Estimating DNA Fragment Size
For a DNA ladder, the common logarithm of fragment size and migration distance show an approximately linear relationship. Assume the following sample regression equation:
log10(bp) = −0.0275 × migration distance (mm) + 3.53
If the sample band migrates 30 mm:
log10(bp) = −0.0275 × 30 + 3.53
= 2.705
bp = 102.705
≈ 507 bp
Sequence Identity
If 468 of 472 analyzable bases match:
Sequence identity (%) = matching bases ÷ compared bases × 100
= 468 ÷ 472 × 100
≈ 99.15%
Mismatch Rate
Mismatch rate (%) = mismatching bases ÷ compared bases × 100
= 4 ÷ 472 × 100
≈ 0.85%
Mutation Frequency
If three base substitutions are found among 472 bases:
Substitution frequency (%) = substitutions ÷ compared bases × 100
= 3 ÷ 472 × 100
≈ 0.64%
Mean Fragment Size
Mean = (515 + 522 + 518) ÷ 3
= 518.3 bp
Standard Deviation
s = √{Σ(xi − x̄)2 ÷ (n − 1)}
≈ 3.5 bp
Coefficient of Variation
Coefficient of variation (%) = standard deviation ÷ mean × 100
= 3.5 ÷ 518.3 × 100
≈ 0.68%
Theoretical PCR Amplification Factor
If DNA ideally doubles during each cycle, the theoretical amplification factor after n cycles is:
Theoretical amplification factor = 2n
At 35 cycles, 235 ≈ 3.44 × 1010-fold
In practice, amplification does not follow the theoretical value exactly because of reduced reaction efficiency, reagent depletion, product reannealing, and other factors.
Main Sources of Error
| Source of error | Effect on results | Improvement |
|---|---|---|
| Insufficient DNA extraction | PCR amplification becomes weak | Check extraction procedure and sample amount |
| DNA degradation | Long regions are difficult to amplify | Store samples appropriately |
| Protein contamination | A260/A280 decreases and reactions may be inhibited | Review purification procedure |
| Salt or organic contamination | PCR enzymes are inhibited | Perform sufficient washing and purification |
| DNA concentration measurement error | Incorrect DNA amount is added to PCR | Check blank and measurement range |
| Pipetting error | Reaction composition varies | Use a pipette suitable for the volume |
| Failure to add primers | No amplification occurs | Use a reaction table and checklist |
| Incorrect primer concentration | Low yield or nonspecific amplification occurs | Use the specified concentration |
| Annealing temperature too low | Nonspecific bands increase | Optimize temperature conditions |
| Annealing temperature too high | Target band becomes weak | Check with a temperature gradient |
| Too few cycles | Bands become faint | Set an appropriate number of cycles |
| Too many cycles | Nonspecific amplification or saturation occurs | Do not increase cycles unnecessarily |
| Excess template DNA | Reaction inhibition or smearing occurs | Dilute appropriately |
| Insufficient template DNA | Target band is not detected | Check input amount |
| Cross-contamination between samples | Bands from another sample appear | Change tips and separate work areas |
| Contamination with amplification products | Bands appear in the negative control | Separate pre- and post-PCR work areas |
| Contaminated negative control | Reliability of the experiment decreases | Inspect reagents and work environment |
| Positive-control failure | Negative results cannot be interpreted | Check reagents, equipment, and conditions |
| Incorrect gel concentration | Separation of target-size fragments is poor | Select a concentration suitable for fragment size |
| Sample overloaded | Thick bands or smearing occurs | Reduce loading amount |
| Leakage from well | Bands disappear or become distorted | Do not pierce the well with the pipette tip |
| Reversed electrophoresis direction | DNA runs out of the gel | Check electrode orientation |
| Insufficient electrophoresis time | Band separation is inadequate | Run for an appropriate duration |
| Excessive electrophoresis time | Small fragments run out of the gel | Monitor the tracking dye position |
| Excessive voltage | Heating occurs and bands distort | Use the specified voltage |
| Poor DNA ladder | Size estimation becomes difficult | Use a fresh ladder |
| Image overexposure | Bands become saturated | Shorten exposure time |
| Image underexposure | Weak bands may be missed | Capture images under multiple conditions |
| Migration-distance measurement error | Fragment-size estimates shift | Measure consistently from the well reference |
| Low-quality sequencing trace | Incorrect bases are called | Exclude low-quality regions |
| Incorrect sequence orientation | Sequence identity decreases markedly | Check the reverse-complement sequence |
| Misalignment | Many false mismatches appear | Align while accounting for insertions and deletions |
| Incorrect reference sequence | Mutations are misinterpreted | Confirm the target species and gene |
| Missed heterozygous site | Genotype is misclassified | Check traces and multiple alleles |
| Identification based only on a short sequence | Closely related species may be misidentified | Use multiple regions or longer sequences |
Example Results
DNA was extracted from three plant-derived samples, and the target gene region was amplified by PCR. DNA concentrations of Samples A, B, and C were 42.5, 36.8, and 51.2 ng/µL, respectively.
Sample A had an A260/A280 ratio of 1.82 and an A260/A230 ratio of 2.03, and its purity was judged suitable for PCR.
Electrophoresis showed main bands of approximately 520 bp in Samples A and B. Sample C showed a band of approximately 700 bp.
The positive control showed the expected band of approximately 520 bp, while no main band was observed in the negative control.
Sequence analysis of the Sample A amplicon allowed comparison of 472 bases, of which 468 matched the reference sequence. Sequence identity was 99.15%.
Three base substitutions and one single-base deletion were observed.
Based on the band patterns, Sample A was estimated to be a short-allele homozygote, Sample B a heterozygote carrying short and long alleles, and Sample C a long-allele homozygote.
Example Discussion
In this experiment, DNA extraction, PCR, electrophoresis, and sequence comparison were performed to analyze genetic differences among samples.
The DNA concentration of Sample A was 42.5 ng/µL, with an A260/A280 ratio of 1.82 and an A260/A230 ratio of 2.03.
In general, an A260/A280 ratio near 1.8 suggests relatively little protein contamination in a DNA sample. The A260/A230 ratio was also near 2.0, suggesting that contamination by salts or organic compounds was not substantial.
However, absorbance ratios alone cannot determine DNA integrity. Even degraded DNA can show apparently normal concentration and absorbance ratios, so the electrophoresis image should also be evaluated.
After PCR, electrophoresis showed bands of approximately 520 bp in Samples A and B. This indicates that the target region between the primers was present in both samples and that PCR amplification occurred.
The positive control also showed a band of approximately 520 bp, indicating that the PCR reagents, temperature conditions, electrophoresis, and staining steps generally functioned properly.
No main band of approximately 520 bp was observed in the negative control, suggesting that there was no major contamination of the reagents or work environment with target DNA.
However, a faint band was observed near 80 bp in the negative control. This was most likely a primer dimer produced by amplification after primers annealed to each other.
If primer dimers are strong, possible causes include excessive primer concentration, an annealing temperature that is too low, or complementarity between the primer sequences.
Sample A showed a weak band at approximately 250 bp in addition to the main band at approximately 520 bp. This may represent a nonspecific amplification product produced when the primers bound outside the target region.
Possible ways to reduce nonspecific bands include increasing the annealing temperature, adjusting primer or magnesium concentration, and reducing the number of cycles.
Sample C showed a band at approximately 700 bp, longer than the approximately 520 bp bands in Samples A and B.
This difference may indicate the presence of an insertion of approximately 180 bp between the primer-binding sites or a difference in the number of repeat sequences.
If Sample A shows only 520 bp, Sample B shows both 520 bp and 700 bp, and Sample C shows only 700 bp, Sample A can be estimated as a short-allele homozygote, Sample B as a heterozygote, and Sample C as a long-allele homozygote.
However, even when only one band is visible, allele dropout may have occurred, in which only one allele was amplified.
Therefore, confirming the genotype with replicate measurements, another primer pair, or sequence analysis is desirable.
Using the migration distance of the DNA ladder and the common logarithm of fragment size, the main band of Sample A was estimated at approximately 507 bp.
Because visual inspection suggested approximately 520 bp, the calculated and visual estimates were broadly consistent. The difference may have arisen from measurement of the band center, gel distortion, ladder migration distances, or approximation in the regression equation.
Sequence analysis showed that 468 of 472 bases matched the reference sequence, giving a sequence identity of 99.15%.
The high sequence identity suggests that the Sample A amplicon originated from the same gene region as the reference sequence.
There were four mismatching bases: three single-base substitutions and one single-base deletion.
To determine whether a single-base substitution represents a true genetic variant or a sequencing error, it is necessary to examine trace quality, the reverse-direction sequence, and replicate analyses.
Sequence-reading quality often decreases near sequence ends, which can lead to incorrect base calls. Low-quality regions should therefore be excluded before calculating sequence identity.
If a single-base insertion or deletion occurs within a protein-coding region, it may cause a frameshift that substantially alters the downstream amino-acid sequence.
By contrast, an insertion or deletion in multiples of three bases may add or remove amino acids while preserving the reading frame.
Base substitutions can also be synonymous substitutions that encode the same amino acid, missense substitutions that change an amino acid, or nonsense substitutions that create a stop codon.
Therefore, evaluating the effect of a mutation requires checking not only the DNA sequence difference but also changes in codons and the amino-acid sequence.
Even when sequence identity between samples is high, a short region alone may not distinguish closely related species or lineages.
To improve the reliability of species identification or phylogenetic analysis, multiple gene regions should be analyzed and compared with reliable sequences in public databases.
In this analysis, DNA concentration, purity, positive and negative controls, band size, and sequence identity were evaluated together.
In genetic analysis, conclusions should not be based solely on obtaining a target band. Nonspecific amplification, contamination, sequence quality, reference-sequence selection, and reproducibility must also be examined.
Overall, Samples A and B were estimated to contain the approximately 520 bp short region, whereas Sample C contained the approximately 700 bp long region.
The sequence of Sample A was 99.15% identical to the reference sequence, with a small number of base substitutions and a deletion.
These results indicate differences among the samples in both DNA fragment length and base sequence, which may be useful for genotype determination and comparisons among lineages.
Example Discussion When the Target Band Is Not Obtained
Possible causes of failure to obtain the target band include insufficient DNA concentration, DNA degradation, contamination with PCR inhibitors, unsuitable primers, inappropriate annealing temperature, or reagent-addition errors. The positive-control result should be checked, and DNA quality and PCR conditions should be reevaluated.
Example Discussion When a Band Appears in the Negative Control
If a band of the target size is observed in the negative control, contamination from reagents, pipettes, the workbench, or previously amplified DNA is suspected. In this case, positive sample results are also unreliable, so the work environment should be cleaned and the experiment repeated with fresh reagents.
Example Discussion When Smearing Is Observed
Possible causes of smearing on the gel include DNA degradation, excessive template DNA, nonspecific amplification, excessive voltage, or salt contamination in the sample. DNA amount, PCR conditions, purification status, and electrophoresis conditions should be reviewed.
Example Discussion When Sequence Identity Is Low
If sequence identity is low, possible causes include amplification of a different gene region, selection of an inappropriate reference sequence, incorrect sequence orientation, inclusion of low-quality regions, or alignment shifts caused by insertions or deletions. The reverse-complement sequence and quality scores should be checked and the sequences realigned.
Example Discussion When Multiple Bands Are Obtained
Multiple bands may result from different-length alleles in a heterozygote, nonspecific amplification, multicopy genes, or a mixed sample. Band sizes, intensities, positive controls, and sequence data should be examined to determine the cause.
Summary
Genetic analysis combines DNA extraction, PCR, electrophoresis, and sequence comparison to examine the presence, length, and base-sequence differences of DNA regions.
Electrophoresis allows the size of amplification products to be estimated by comparison with a DNA ladder.
Sequence analysis can evaluate sequence identity, substitutions, insertions, and deletions and can be used to assess genotypes and lineage differences.
Positive and negative controls are important for judging the reliability of PCR results.
Accurate analysis requires comprehensive checks of DNA quality, primer specificity, contamination prevention, sequence quality, appropriate reference sequences, and replicate measurements.
