In biochemistry experiments, the properties and reactions of biomolecules such as enzymes, proteins, DNA, and cellular components are investigated.
As in chemistry experiments, measured values, graphs, yields, and errors are handled, but in biochemistry experiments it is also necessary to consider factors specific to biomolecules, such as sample denaturation, decreased enzyme activity, protein degradation, DNA damage, and the effects of reagent conditions.
In the discussion section of a biochemistry laboratory report, it is not sufficient simply to write that “enzyme activity was measured,” “protein was detected,” or “a DNA band was visible.”
It is important to explain why the result occurred, how the reaction conditions and sample preparation affected the result, how closely the result agreed with theoretical or expected values, and how measurement errors and operational problems were reflected in the result.
This article clearly explains how to write the results and discussion sections of biochemistry laboratory reports, focusing on enzyme experiments, protein experiments, and DNA experiments, as well as sources of error, points for improvement, and discussion examples.
Note:
This article is a reference intended to assist with discussions of results obtained in biochemistry experiments at universities and similar institutions.
For the actual samples, reagents, enzymes, DNA, proteins, measuring instruments, electrophoresis conditions, PCR conditions, safety precautions, and specified report format, always follow the instructions in your university’s laboratory manual and those given by your instructor or TA.
- Important Perspectives for Discussion in Biochemistry Laboratory Reports
- Main Items to Include in the Results
- Basics of Discussing Enzyme Experiments
- How to Determine Enzyme Activity and Discuss It
- When Absorbance Is Used in Enzyme Reactions
- Effect of Temperature on Enzyme Activity
- Effect of pH on Enzyme Activity
- Discussion of Substrate Concentration and Enzyme Reaction Rate
- Causes of Low Enzyme Activity
- Discussion of Protein Quantification Experiments
- Discussion of Protein Calibration Curves
- Causes of Protein Concentration Being Measured as Low
- Discussion of SDS-PAGE
- Discussion When Bands Are Faint
- Discussion When Extra Bands Appear
- Discussion When Smearing Appears
- Discussion of DNA Extraction Experiments
- Discussion of DNA Concentration and Purity
- Causes of Low DNA Yield
- Discussion of PCR Experiments
- Causes of No Band Appearing in PCR
- Causes of Nonspecific Bands in PCR
- Discussion of DNA Electrophoresis
- Effect of Agarose Gel Concentration
- Common Sources of Error in Protein and DNA Experiments
- Pipetting Errors
- Importance of Temperature Control
- Discussion of Blanks and Control Experiments
- When the Results Can Be Considered Good
- Example Discussion When the Experiment Did Not Go Well
- How to Write Points for Improvement
- Difference Between a Superficial Discussion and a Good Discussion
- Examples of Expressions That Can Be Used in Reports
- Points to Check When Discussing Biochemistry Experiments
- Summary
Important Perspectives for Discussion in Biochemistry Laboratory Reports
In biochemistry experiments, the results are greatly affected by the condition of biomolecules.
For enzymes, activity affects the results; for proteins, concentration and denaturation; and for DNA, purity and the presence or absence of degradation.
Therefore, in the discussion, it is necessary to consider not only the measured values but also sample handling, temperature, pH, reaction time, reagent concentration, and losses during operations.
In addition, biochemistry experiments often use absorbance, fluorescence, electrophoresis bands, enzyme reaction rates, and standard curves to judge the results.
In a report, it is important to clearly state what the measured values mean and on what basis the target substance was confirmed.
Example Discussion:
In this experiment, the properties of biomolecules in the sample were evaluated from the measured values.
In biochemistry experiments, sample-storage conditions, temperature, pH, reaction time, and reagent concentration greatly affect the results.
Therefore, when discussing the obtained results, it is necessary to consider not only the measured values but also the operating conditions from sample preparation through measurement.
Main Items to Include in the Results
In the results of biochemistry experiments, measured values, standard curves, concentrations, activities, band patterns, molecular-weight estimates, yields, purity, and similar data are organized.
The items to include differ depending on the type of experiment, but it is important to summarize the results so that it is clear which conclusions were drawn from which measured values.
Main Items to Include in the Results
- Name of the sample used in the experiment
- Measurement conditions
- Measured values such as absorbance, fluorescence, and color development
- Standard curve or calibration curve
- Protein concentration
- Enzyme activity
- Specific activity
- Reaction rate
- DNA concentration
- DNA purity
- Position and intensity of electrophoresis bands
- Comparison with molecular weight markers
- Comparison with theoretical or expected values
- Sources of error and points for improvement
Example of How to Write the Results:
The protein concentration in the unknown sample was determined using a calibration curve prepared from standard samples.
In addition, changes in absorbance associated with the enzyme reaction were plotted against time, and the initial rate was determined.
From the obtained results, the target protein or enzyme activity is considered to have been present in the sample.
Basics of Discussing Enzyme Experiments
Enzyme experiments investigate the rate at which an enzyme converts a substrate into a product and changes in activity caused by reaction conditions.
Enzyme activity is affected by temperature, pH, substrate concentration, enzyme concentration, inhibitors, reaction time, and other factors.
Therefore, in the discussion, explain under which conditions the reaction rate or absorbance change became larger or smaller.
Because enzymes are proteins, their three-dimensional structures may change at high temperatures or extreme pH values, resulting in decreased activity.
In a discussion of an enzyme experiment, it is useful to relate changes in enzyme activity to the three-dimensional structure of the enzyme and the condition of the active site.
Example Discussion:
In an enzyme reaction, the substrate binds to the active site of the enzyme and is converted into product.
In this experiment, differences in enzyme activity were observed depending on the reaction conditions.
This is considered to have occurred because temperature and pH affected the three-dimensional structure of the enzyme and the condition of the active site, changing substrate binding and the reaction rate.
How to Determine Enzyme Activity and Discuss It
Enzyme activity represents how much substrate is consumed or how much product is formed per unit time.
When changes in absorbance are used, the reaction rate is determined from the change in absorbance over time and, when necessary, converted into an amount of substance using a molar absorption coefficient or calibration curve.
When determining the reaction rate, the linear portion at the beginning of the reaction is often used.
As the reaction proceeds, the substrate concentration may decrease and products may accumulate, causing the reaction rate to become nonconstant.
Example Discussion:
The initial reaction rate was determined from changes in absorbance over time, and enzyme activity was calculated.
During the initial stage of the reaction, the substrate concentration is sufficiently high and the effect of the product is small, making enzyme activity easier to evaluate.
On the other hand, during the later stages of the reaction, the rate may decrease because of substrate depletion and product accumulation, so it is important to use the initial rate.
When Absorbance Is Used in Enzyme Reactions
In enzyme reactions, if the product or substrate absorbs at a specific wavelength, the progress of the reaction can be monitored from changes in absorbance.
If the absorbance increases, the amount of product that absorbs at that wavelength may be increasing, while if the absorbance decreases, the substrate may be being consumed.
When absorbance is used, the measurement wavelength, blank correction, turbidity of the reaction solution, bubbles, contamination of the cuvette, and linearity of the measurement range are important.
If the absorbance is too high or too low, the accuracy of conversion to concentration may decrease.
Example Discussion:
Because the absorbance increased as the enzyme reaction proceeded, the amount of product absorbing at the measurement wavelength is considered to have increased.
Because the change in absorbance reflects the reaction rate, the initial rate was determined from the slope of the absorbance change over time.
However, blank correction, contamination of the cuvette, and turbidity of the reaction solution affect absorbance and therefore become sources of error in enzyme activity.
Effect of Temperature on Enzyme Activity
Enzyme activity is strongly affected by temperature.
As the temperature rises, molecular motion becomes more active and the frequency of collisions between enzyme and substrate increases, so the reaction rate increases within a certain range.
However, if the temperature becomes too high, the enzyme protein denatures and the three-dimensional structure and active site collapse, causing activity to decrease.
Therefore, enzymes have an optimum temperature at which activity is highest.
In a temperature-activity graph, activity may increase from low temperature to the optimum temperature and then decrease sharply at higher temperatures.
Example Discussion:
Enzyme activity increased as the temperature rose, but decreased under high-temperature conditions.
From low to moderate temperatures, molecular motion of the enzyme and substrate became more active and the reaction rate is considered to have increased.
In contrast, at high temperatures, the enzyme protein denatured and the structure of the active site changed, inhibiting substrate binding and the catalytic reaction and causing activity to decrease.
Effect of pH on Enzyme Activity
Enzyme activity is also greatly affected by pH.
Acidic and basic amino acid residues are involved in enzyme active sites, and their charge states change depending on pH.
If the pH is not appropriate, the charge states required for substrate binding and the reaction change, causing enzyme activity to decrease.
In addition, under extreme pH conditions, the three-dimensional structure of the enzyme protein may also change.
Therefore, enzymes have an optimum pH at which activity is highest.
Example Discussion:
Enzyme activity reached a maximum at a particular pH and decreased on either the more acidic or more basic side.
This is considered to have occurred because changes in pH altered the charge states of amino acid residues in the active site and affected substrate binding and catalytic reactions.
In addition, under extreme pH conditions, the three-dimensional structure of the enzyme may have changed and activity may have decreased.
Discussion of Substrate Concentration and Enzyme Reaction Rate
In the low-substrate-concentration range, increasing the substrate concentration makes encounters between enzyme and substrate more likely and increases the reaction rate.
However, when the substrate concentration becomes sufficiently high, the enzyme’s active sites are almost completely occupied by substrate and the reaction rate approaches its maximum value.
Under this condition, adding more substrate does not greatly increase the reaction rate.
This type of relationship may be discussed as a Michaelis-Menten-type enzyme reaction.
In a report, it is useful to explain in which concentration range the reaction rate increased and where it reached a plateau.
Example Discussion:
The reaction rate increased as the substrate concentration increased, but the increase became more gradual on the high-concentration side.
In the low-concentration range, substrate concentration limited the reaction rate, and increasing the substrate is considered to have increased formation of the enzyme-substrate complex.
In contrast, in the high-concentration range, the enzyme’s active sites were almost completely occupied by substrate and the reaction rate approached its maximum value, resulting in only a small further increase in rate.
Causes of Low Enzyme Activity
Causes of enzyme activity being lower than expected include enzyme inactivation, inappropriate temperature conditions, pH deviations, insufficient substrate concentration, deviations in reaction time, contamination by inhibitory substances, and poor sample-storage conditions.
Because enzymes are proteins, their activity may decrease because of heating, freeze-thaw cycles, prolonged standing, strong acids or bases, organic solvents, and similar factors.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason the enzyme activity was measured as low is that the enzyme had been partially inactivated.
Enzymes are proteins, and changes in temperature, deviations in pH, or denaturation during storage may alter their three-dimensional structures and prevent their active sites from functioning.
As a result, substrate binding and product formation decreased, causing the measured enzyme activity to become lower.
Discussion of Protein Quantification Experiments
In protein quantification experiments, methods such as the Bradford assay, Lowry method, BCA assay, and UV absorption method are used to determine the protein concentration in a sample.
In many cases, a calibration curve is prepared using a standard protein of known concentration, and the concentration of an unknown sample is determined from its absorbance.
In a discussion of protein quantification, consider the linearity of the calibration curve, differences in reactivity between the standard protein and the unknown sample, the absorbance measurement range, interfering substances in the sample, and errors in pipetting.
Example Discussion:
A calibration curve was prepared using a standard protein, and the protein concentration was determined from the absorbance of the unknown sample.
Because the unknown sample could be measured within the linear range of the calibration curve, the concentration conversion is considered generally reasonable.
However, if salts, surfactants, reducing agents, or similar substances in the sample affected the color reaction, the protein concentration may have been overestimated or underestimated.
Discussion of Protein Calibration Curves
In protein quantification, a calibration curve is prepared from the relationship between standard protein concentration and absorbance.
The closer the calibration curve is to a straight line, the easier it is to determine the concentration of the unknown sample.
However, if the concentration is too high, the color reaction may become saturated and the absorbance may deviate from the straight line.
If the absorbance of the unknown sample lies outside the calibration-curve range, the result becomes an extrapolation and the error becomes larger.
In that case, it is desirable to dilute the sample so that it falls within the calibration-curve range.
Example Discussion:
The calibration curve of protein concentration and absorbance showed an approximately linear relationship.
This suggests that absorbance was proportional to protein concentration within the measurement range.
On the other hand, possible reasons that the measurement points deviated from the line on the high-concentration side include saturation of the color reaction and limitations of the absorbance measurement range.
Causes of Protein Concentration Being Measured as Low
Causes of protein concentration being measured as lower than expected include insufficient extraction, losses during precipitation or centrifugation, protein degradation, dilution errors, errors in the calibration curve, and interference with the color reaction.
Because proteins may denature or degrade because of heat, pH changes, or proteases, sample handling is important.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason the protein concentration was measured as lower than expected is loss during the extraction procedure.
If part of the protein was lost when recovering the supernatant after centrifugation or was removed as a precipitate, the amount of protein in the measured sample would decrease.
In addition, if proteins were degraded or denatured during storage, the quantified value may also have become lower.
Discussion of SDS-PAGE
SDS-PAGE is an electrophoresis method used to separate proteins mainly according to differences in molecular weight.
SDS denatures proteins and gives them a negative charge.
Therefore, smaller-molecular-weight proteins move faster through the gel and tend to appear farther down the gel.
In a discussion of SDS-PAGE, explain the position of the target protein band, comparison with the molecular weight marker, band intensity, extra bands, smearing, degree of purification, and presence or absence of degradation.
Example Discussion:
SDS-PAGE showed a band at a position corresponding to the target protein when compared with the molecular weight marker.
This suggests that the target protein may have been present in the sample.
On the other hand, because multiple bands other than the target band were also observed, the sample is considered to have contained impurity proteins and not to have been completely purified.
Discussion When Bands Are Faint
If bands are faint in electrophoresis, possible causes include a small amount of protein or DNA in the sample, insufficient staining, a small sample-loading amount, degradation, or low extraction efficiency.
Bands may also become unclear if the target substance diffuses within the gel or if the electrophoresis conditions are inappropriate.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason the target band was observed faintly is that the amount of target protein in the sample was small.
If protein was lost during extraction or purification, the amount loaded onto the gel would decrease and the stained band would also become faint.
Protein degradation and insufficient staining may also reduce band intensity.
Discussion When Extra Bands Appear
If extra bands appear in SDS-PAGE or DNA electrophoresis, the sample may contain proteins or DNA fragments other than the target substance.
For proteins, possible causes include incomplete purification, degradation products, and insufficient dissociation of complexes.
For DNA, possible causes include nonspecific PCR products, primer dimers, degraded DNA, and undigested fragments.
Example Discussion:
Multiple bands other than the target band were observed.
Possible causes include the presence of proteins other than the target protein in the sample and partial degradation of the target protein.
Therefore, the obtained sample was not completely composed of a single component, and problems with the degree of purification or sample-storage conditions may have been present.
Discussion When Smearing Appears
Smearing refers to a condition in which bands are not clearly defined in electrophoresis and instead spread as a blurred signal.
For proteins, possible causes include overloading, degradation, the effects of salt concentration, and poor electrophoresis conditions.
For DNA, possible causes include degradation, overloading, inappropriate gel concentration, excessively high voltage, and impurities in the sample.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason smearing was observed in electrophoresis is that the sample had degraded.
When DNA or proteins are degraded into fragments of various sizes, they appear as a broad signal rather than a single clear band.
Excessive sample loading or residual impurities such as salts may also disturb the electrophoresis pattern.
Discussion of DNA Extraction Experiments
In DNA extraction experiments, DNA is extracted from cells or tissues, and its concentration, purity, and degree of degradation are evaluated.
DNA extraction involves operations such as cell disruption, protein removal, RNA removal, precipitation, washing, and dissolution.
Losses and contamination with impurities may occur at any stage.
In a discussion of DNA extraction, explain the amount of DNA obtained, absorbance at 260 nm, the 260/280 ratio, electrophoresis bands, presence or absence of smearing, and contamination by proteins or RNA.
Example Discussion:
After DNA extraction, the amount and condition of DNA were confirmed by absorbance measurement and electrophoresis.
If a clear band was observed on the high-molecular-weight side in electrophoresis, the DNA is considered to have been extracted without extensive degradation.
On the other hand, if a smear was observed, physical shearing during the extraction procedure or degradation by nucleases may have occurred.
Discussion of DNA Concentration and Purity
DNA concentration may be determined from absorbance at 260 nm.
This is because nucleic acids such as DNA and RNA absorb near 260 nm.
Proteins, on the other hand, absorb near 280 nm, so the 260/280 ratio may be used to evaluate DNA purity.
If the 260/280 ratio is low, contamination by proteins or phenol is suspected.
If the 260/280 ratio is too high, RNA contamination or measurement error may be possible.
However, because interpretation of the ratio depends on the measuring instrument and sample conditions, follow the criteria in the laboratory manual.
Example Discussion:
The DNA concentration was calculated from absorbance at 260 nm, and purity was evaluated using the 260/280 ratio.
If the 260/280 ratio was lower than the ideal value, proteins, phenol, or similar substances may have contaminated the sample.
Therefore, insufficient washing or protein removal after extraction may have caused the decrease in DNA purity.
Causes of Low DNA Yield
Causes of low DNA yield include insufficient cell disruption, insufficient precipitation, loss during supernatant removal, loss during washing, insufficient DNA dissolution, and insufficient sample amount.
In addition, because DNA is a long macromolecule, it may be cut by vigorous stirring or pipetting.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason the DNA yield was low is that cell disruption was insufficient and DNA was not completely released.
The yield may also decrease if part of the pellet is lost during recovery of precipitated DNA or if DNA is washed away during the washing procedure.
Therefore, in DNA extraction, it is important to minimize losses during each stage of cell disruption, precipitate recovery, washing, and redissolution.
Discussion of PCR Experiments
PCR is a method used to amplify a specific DNA region.
The target DNA fragment is amplified when the DNA template, primers, DNA polymerase, dNTPs, Mg2+, buffer, and thermal-cycle conditions are appropriately combined.
After PCR, agarose gel electrophoresis is used to confirm whether a band of the target size is present.
In a discussion of PCR, check for the presence or absence of the target-size band, band intensity, nonspecific bands, primer dimers, and the results of negative and positive controls.
Example Discussion:
After PCR, electrophoresis showed a band near the target size when compared with the molecular weight marker.
This suggests that the target DNA fragment was amplified.
On the other hand, if bands other than the target size were observed, nonspecific amplification may have occurred because of nonspecific primer binding or an inappropriate annealing temperature.
Causes of No Band Appearing in PCR
Causes of failure to obtain the target band in PCR include insufficient template DNA, DNA degradation, problems with primer design, inappropriate annealing temperature, inappropriate Mg2+ concentration, enzyme inactivation, inappropriate cycle conditions, and contamination with PCR inhibitors.
In addition, if the electrophoresis or staining conditions are inappropriate, the amplified product may not be visible.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason the target band could not be confirmed after PCR is that the amount of template DNA was insufficient.
In addition, if inhibitory substances such as proteins or salts were present in the extracted DNA, DNA polymerase activity may have been inhibited and amplification may not have proceeded.
Furthermore, if the annealing temperature was too high, the primers may not have bound readily to the template, making amplification of the target fragment difficult.
Causes of Nonspecific Bands in PCR
If bands other than the target size appear in PCR, the primers may have bound to sequences other than the target sequence.
If the annealing temperature is too low, primers can more easily bind to partially matching sequences, resulting in nonspecific amplification.
Excessively high primer concentration or Mg2+ concentration may also increase nonspecific amplification.
Example Discussion:
A possible cause of bands appearing at sizes other than the target size is nonspecific PCR amplification.
When the annealing temperature is low, primers can more easily bind to sequences other than the target sequence, causing multiple DNA fragments to be amplified.
As a result, extra bands other than the target band are considered to have appeared in electrophoresis.
Discussion of DNA Electrophoresis
In DNA electrophoresis, DNA is negatively charged because of its phosphate groups and therefore moves toward the positive electrode in an electric field.
In an agarose gel, smaller DNA fragments pass more easily through the gel network and migrate farther.
By comparing them with a molecular weight marker, the approximate size of the target DNA fragment can be determined.
Example Discussion:
Because DNA is negatively charged by its phosphate groups, it migrates toward the positive electrode during electrophoresis.
In an agarose gel, smaller DNA fragments migrate farther.
In this experiment, a band was observed near the target size when compared with the molecular weight marker, suggesting that the target DNA fragment was present.
Effect of Agarose Gel Concentration
Agarose gel concentration affects separation of DNA fragments.
The higher the gel concentration, the finer the gel network becomes, making it suitable for separation of small DNA fragments.
At lower gel concentrations, large DNA fragments migrate more easily, but separation of small fragments may become insufficient.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason the DNA bands were insufficiently separated is that the agarose gel concentration was not suitable for the target DNA size.
The higher the gel concentration, the finer the gel network becomes, making it suitable for separation of small DNA fragments.
On the other hand, if the gel concentration is too high for a large target fragment, migration may be hindered and band separation may become poor.
Common Sources of Error in Protein and DNA Experiments
Protein and DNA experiments have common sources of error.
Representative examples include pipetting errors, sample degradation, inadequate temperature control, reagent deterioration, insufficient mixing, losses during centrifugation, and insufficient calibration of measuring instruments.
Because many biomolecules are sensitive to handling, careful operation greatly affects the results.
| Source of Error | What Happens | Effect on Results |
|---|---|---|
| Pipetting error | Sample or reagent amount deviates | Concentration, activity, and band intensity deviate |
| Sample degradation | Proteins or DNA are damaged | Lower yield, smearing, lower activity |
| Inadequate temperature control | Enzyme activity and reaction rate change | Variation in measured values |
| Reagent deterioration | Reaction does not proceed sufficiently | Insufficient color development, poor amplification |
| Insufficient mixing | Reaction solution is not uniform | Reduced reproducibility |
Example Discussion:
In biochemistry experiments, pipetting, temperature control, and sample degradation greatly affect the results.
In particular, proteins and DNA are susceptible to degradation and denaturation, so the temperature, time, and reagent conditions during operations must be kept constant.
If these conditions were inadequate, variation may have occurred in concentration measurements, enzyme activity, and electrophoresis-band intensity.
Pipetting Errors
In biochemistry experiments, small amounts of samples and reagents are often handled, so errors in pipetting greatly affect the results.
Even slight deviations in sample or reagent volume change enzyme activity, protein concentration, DNA concentration, and PCR reaction conditions.
Particularly with micropipettes, problems include liquid remaining at the tip, aspirating air bubbles, using the wrong plunger position, and difficulty accurately aspirating viscous samples.
Example Discussion:
Errors in micropipette operation may explain the variation in measured values.
Because biochemistry experiments handle very small amounts of samples and reagents, even slight volume errors change the concentrations in the reaction solution.
As a result, enzyme activity, protein-quantification values, and PCR amplification efficiency may have been affected.
Importance of Temperature Control
Temperature control is extremely important in biochemistry experiments.
Enzyme reaction rates change with temperature, and proteins and DNA may denature or degrade when exposed to high temperatures or left for long periods.
If samples that should be stored at low temperature are left at room temperature, activity may decrease or degradation may occur.
Example Discussion:
One possible reason the results were lower than expected is inadequate temperature control of the sample.
Enzymes and proteins are sensitive to temperature changes and may denature or become inactivated when exposed to high temperatures or left at room temperature for a long time.
As a result, enzyme activity or protein amount may have been measured as lower.
Discussion of Blanks and Control Experiments
Blanks and control experiments are important in biochemistry experiments.
Blanks are used to subtract absorbance or color development originating from sources other than the sample.
Negative controls confirm conditions in which no reaction should occur, while positive controls confirm that the reaction system is functioning correctly.
If the control experiments do not give appropriate results, it becomes difficult to draw a correct conclusion from the target sample alone.
In PCR, a band in the negative control suggests contamination, while absence of a band in the positive control may indicate problems with the PCR conditions or reagents.
Example Discussion:
Blank measurements were used to correct for absorbance originating from reagents and solvents.
In addition, control experiments were used to confirm whether the reaction system was functioning correctly.
If a signal is observed in the negative control, contamination or a nonspecific reaction is suspected, while if no signal is obtained in the positive control, there may have been a problem with the reagents or reaction conditions.
When the Results Can Be Considered Good
Biochemistry experiment results can be considered good when the standard curve has good linearity, the measured values show reproducibility, the control experiments give the expected results, and the electrophoresis bands match the target size or expected position.
It is also important that enzyme activity, protein concentration, and DNA concentration show theoretically expected trends.
Example Discussion:
The standard curve showed good linearity, and the measured values of the unknown sample also fell within its range.
In addition, the control experiments gave the expected results, and the target band or target signal was confirmed in the target sample.
From these results, the measurements in this experiment are considered generally valid, and the presence or activity of the target molecule could be evaluated.
Example Discussion When the Experiment Did Not Go Well
If a biochemistry experiment does not go well, possible causes are considered from results such as a non-linear standard curve, low enzyme activity, absence of a band, extra bands, smearing, or control experiments that differ from expectations.
Rather than ending the discussion with “operational error,” it is easier to discuss the results by separately considering sample condition, reagent conditions, reaction conditions, and measurement methods.
Example Discussion:
In this experiment, only a weaker signal than expected was obtained from the target sample.
Possible causes include a small amount of the target molecule in the sample, losses during extraction or purification, and degradation or denaturation of the sample.
In addition, if the reaction conditions or measurement conditions were not optimal, enzyme activity, color intensity, or electrophoresis-band intensity may also have decreased.
How to Write Points for Improvement
In the discussion of a biochemistry experiment, including points for improvement as well as sources of error makes the report easier to organize.
Improvements are easier to write when divided into sample handling, temperature control, pipetting, measurement conditions, and control experiments.
Improvements to Sample and Temperature Control
- Store samples at an appropriate temperature
- Do not leave enzymes or proteins at room temperature for long periods
- Reduce the number of freeze-thaw cycles
- Perform operations under low-temperature conditions when necessary
- Establish conditions that prevent sample degradation
Improvements to Operations and Measurements
- Use micropipettes accurately
- Prevent contamination by changing tips
- Mix reaction solutions thoroughly
- Standardize reaction times accurately
- Perform blank correction appropriately
- Measure unknown samples within the standard-curve range
Improvements to Electrophoresis and PCR
- Select a gel concentration appropriate for the target size
- Avoid overloading samples
- Use appropriate electrophoresis voltage and time
- Always check positive and negative controls in PCR
- Review primer conditions and annealing temperature
- Prevent degradation of DNA and proteins
Example of How to Write Points for Improvement:
To improve the reproducibility of the experimental results, samples must be stored at an appropriate temperature and degradation or denaturation during operations must be prevented.
In addition, because very small amounts of samples are handled, it is important to use micropipettes accurately and mix reaction solutions thoroughly.
Furthermore, by setting appropriate blanks and control experiments, the results of the target sample can be evaluated more accurately.
Difference Between a Superficial Discussion and a Good Discussion
In the discussion of a biochemistry experiment, simply writing that “enzyme activity was present,” “a band appeared,” or “DNA was extracted” results in a superficial discussion.
It is important to explain what the measured values mean, why the result occurred, and which operations or conditions affected the result.
| Superficial Discussion | Good Discussion |
|---|---|
| Enzyme activity was low. | Possible causes of the low enzyme activity include temperature or pH being outside the optimum conditions, partial inactivation of the enzyme during storage, and insufficient substrate concentration. |
| Protein was detected. | Because the absorbance of the unknown sample could be measured within the calibration-curve range, calculation of the protein concentration is considered generally reasonable. However, interfering substances in the sample may have affected the color reaction. |
| A DNA band appeared. | Because a band was observed near the target size when compared with the molecular weight marker, the target DNA fragment is considered to be present. On the other hand, if extra bands were observed, nonspecific amplification or DNA degradation may have occurred. |
Examples of Expressions That Can Be Used in Reports
The following expressions can be used when writing the results and discussion of a biochemistry experiment.
Adjust the necessary parts according to your own experimental results.
- Enzyme activity is affected by temperature, pH, substrate concentration, and enzyme concentration.
- The initial rate was determined from changes in absorbance during the initial stage of the reaction and used to evaluate enzyme activity.
- Under high-temperature conditions, the enzyme protein may have denatured and activity may have decreased.
- Changes in pH altered the charge state of the active site and are considered to have affected substrate binding.
- Because measurement was performed within the linear range of the calibration curve, the concentration conversion is considered generally reasonable.
- Bands other than the target band may originate from impurities or nonspecific reactions.
- Because smearing was observed, the DNA or protein may have been degraded.
- If the 260/280 ratio is low, contamination by proteins or organic solvents may be present.
- Possible causes of failure to obtain the target band in PCR include insufficient template and contamination by inhibitory substances.
- By checking the results of control experiments, the reliability of the target-sample results can be evaluated.
Points to Check When Discussing Biochemistry Experiments
Checking the following points before writing the report makes the discussion easier to write.
- Have you explained what the measured values represent?
- Have you checked the linearity of the standard curve or calibration curve?
- Does the unknown sample fall within the measurement range?
- Have you related enzyme activity to temperature, pH, and substrate concentration?
- Have you discussed protein denaturation and degradation?
- Have you considered DNA purity and the presence or absence of degradation?
- Have you compared electrophoresis bands with a molecular weight marker?
- Have you considered the causes of extra bands and smearing?
- Have you checked blanks and control experiments?
- Have you considered errors in pipetting and dilution?
- Have you considered the effects of sample storage and temperature control?
- Do the points for improvement correspond to the sources of error?
Summary
In biochemistry laboratory reports, because biomolecules such as enzymes, proteins, and DNA are handled, it is important to discuss not only measured values but also sample conditions and reaction conditions.
In enzyme experiments, temperature, pH, substrate concentration, and enzyme concentration affect activity.
In protein experiments, consider calibration curves, color reactions, denaturation, degradation, and the effects of impurities.
In DNA experiments, check extraction efficiency, purity, degradation, PCR conditions, and electrophoresis bands.
In biochemistry experiments, pipetting, temperature control, sample storage, blank correction, and control experiments determine the reliability of the results.
In particular, biomolecules are susceptible to denaturation and degradation, so the conditions during operations are strongly reflected in the results.
In a report, do not simply write that “enzyme activity was present,” “protein was detected,” or “a DNA band appeared.”
Explain why the result occurred in relation to the reaction conditions, sample condition, measurement method, and sources of error.
Relating the results to the operating conditions produces a more persuasive biochemistry laboratory report.
